Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<9758aba821ec7e0f967df479c31e0424@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:10:44 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <9758aba821ec7e0f967df479c31e0424@www.novabbs.com>
References: <aecb6e4bd2b86ebc457767da8cc40c02@www.novabbs.com> <vkPYO.4701732$1pff.4574957@fx05.ams4> <51913df2deed4fbbc7eb95fb07397186@www.novabbs.com> <S46ZO.4715827$1pff.310997@fx05.ams4> <2ae5e43140f7d9b3407008eea993c4ba@www.novabbs.com> <1RkZO.2$Dhn6.1@fx16.ams4> <102e4878439c34ae8e7ae09082128eb3@www.novabbs.com> <PUMZO.18404$xDBd.14808@fx13.ams4> <797ace0c06202d7eda70828ad43931b4@www.novabbs.com> <GD1_O.53552$DBH7.14261@fx01.ams4> <a2839b1420cf819dbece0e4f7c48cafb@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2886902"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="Ooch2ht+q3xfrepY75FKkEEx2SPWDQTvfft66HacveI";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 504a4e36a1e6a0679da537f565a179f60d7acbd8
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$lUxqKRir5w3.P4XXKnCn1O2twg13GRyThb4Jkst/Pfa5sLyktezcW
Bytes: 2615
Lines: 23

On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:36:10 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

 And: "The NIST experiments focused on two scenarios predicted by
> Einstein's theories of relativity. First, when two clocks are subjected
> to unequal gravitational forces due to their different elevations above
> the surface of the Earth, the higher clock—experiencing a smaller
> gravitational force—runs faster." -
> https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/09/nist-pair-aluminum-atomic-clocks-reveal-einsteins-relativity-personal-scale
>
> I agree that it is obviously ridiculous to claim time itself changes
> because a clock changes. However, the ESA does just this in the above
> quote.

I am sure that you have been *REPEATEDLY* warned that the people
writing news releases for dissemination to the general public often
get things wrong.

It will do no good for me to point out your misunderstandings, since I
am sure that it has already been explained to you countless times the
distinction between gravitational force and gravitational potential,
and what happens when signals are transmitted between observers at
different gravitational potentials.

Go wallow some more in your pigsty of ignorance.