Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies
 non-terminating behavior to HHH
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 07:40:40 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <97fc354891bed75981f2e3a95c4ab9c7eec13584@i2pn2.org>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me>
 <3b8a5f4be53047b2a6c03f9678d0253e137d3c40@i2pn2.org>
 <votn1l$pb7c$1@dont-email.me>
 <5cd9bc55c484f10efd7818ecadf169a11fcc58e1@i2pn2.org>
 <votq5o$ppgs$1@dont-email.me> <vouu57$12hqt$3@dont-email.me>
 <vp1jkg$1kstl$1@dont-email.me> <vp1qp1$1m05h$2@dont-email.me>
 <vp46l6$26r1n$1@dont-email.me> <vp5t55$2gt2s$1@dont-email.me>
 <vp6pmb$2opvi$1@dont-email.me> <vp8700$30tdq$1@dont-email.me>
 <vp9ct8$3af6t$1@dont-email.me> <vpav34$3jct4$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpc3u9$3skb7$1@dont-email.me> <vpcsvk$irt$2@dont-email.me>
 <vpev2e$fgop$1@dont-email.me> <vpfmpp$j7qb$6@dont-email.me>
 <vphbnb$10gus$1@dont-email.me> <vpivp4$1fvqe$6@dont-email.me>
 <vpklrk$21jn9$1@dont-email.me> <vplbnp$25vp2$5@dont-email.me>
 <b122ed1dc2c636321627d4dfc7936e463f920690@i2pn2.org>
 <vpltcn$28j3a$6@dont-email.me>
 <7eb818791abdbf7830165a16375b0aa7c82be013@i2pn2.org>
 <vpn9eu$2jkdj$4@dont-email.me>
 <5d6c248196511204513c0303bb393cceec0fd8ec@i2pn2.org>
 <vporov$2vaf3$9@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 12:40:40 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2029402"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vporov$2vaf3$9@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3645
Lines: 44

On 2/27/25 12:04 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 2/26/2025 5:53 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 2/26/25 9:45 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 2/26/2025 3:29 AM, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:13:43 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>> On 2/25/2025 5:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> The behavior of DD emulated by HHH only refers to DD and the fact that
>>>>> HHH emulates this DD.
>>>> On on hand, the simulator can have no influence on the execution.
>>>
>>>> On the other, that same simulator is part of the program.
>>>> You don't understand this simple entanglement.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Unless having no influence causes itself to
>>> never terminate then the one influence that
>>> it must have is stopping the emulation of this input.
>>>
>>
>> But it isn't an EXTERNAL influnce, but the behavior of the code of the 
>> program itself, in the code of HHH that DD calls, which *IS* part of DD.
>>
>> You are just proving you don't kno
> 
> We are asking can DD emulated by HHH possibly reach its
> own return instruction?

No, maybe that is the strawman you are tring to invent.

> 
> Dishonest dodges away from this point are less than no rebuttal at all.
> 

Yes, *YOUR* dishonest dodges from what the words you use actually mean 
just proves that you are totally ignorant of what you are talking about, 
and that you don't care just proves that you are just a pathological 
liar, and that you are so stupid you can't see that you are stupid,

Sorry, but you are just proving that you are worse than the things you 
claim you are trying to save the world from, as your "logic" is based on 
the assumption of the impossible, and the validity of lying about things.