Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Computable Functions --- finite string transformation rules
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 20:23:49 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <99367baaadfd647c1d75f4236345a3243a439a0b@i2pn2.org>
References: <vsnchj$23nrb$2@dont-email.me> <vtmah8$2a90$2@dont-email.me>
	<vtmgen$gs48$1@dont-email.me>
	<c2ad5086dba36124c070173c3e3252967df2fab9@i2pn2.org>
	<vu8g3q$v0qa$1@dont-email.me> <vu8lse$vn9b$1@dont-email.me>
	<vu8og4$13jl5$7@dont-email.me>
	<6d9ae3ac08bbbe4407fc3612441fc2032f949a3d@i2pn2.org>
	<vub168$3clpn$2@dont-email.me>
	<7ac75991b443ba53d52960ddb1932524dea8e03f@i2pn2.org>
	<40b048f71fe2ed2a8ef11d2d587c765c8fcbc977@i2pn2.org>
	<vucrgq$148pf$1@dont-email.me> <vudkt8$1ona3$2@dont-email.me>
	<vudp39$1rhdn$1@dont-email.me> <vudrgb$20gck$1@dont-email.me>
	<vue2fb$27hl3$1@dont-email.me> <vue464$28iho$2@dont-email.me>
	<vue57b$27hl3$3@dont-email.me> <vue8qm$2d7t8$1@dont-email.me>
	<cb382175aa6cc9a806dedc1d2bcfbd916dfaf1b5@i2pn2.org>
	<vuejgn$2md4c$3@dont-email.me>
	<ae8fce7ec0639d76c87bf1af0dfbc2a806053899@i2pn2.org>
	<vugucr$pke9$5@dont-email.me> <vui77f$217h6$2@dont-email.me>
	<vuj538$2lf64$9@dont-email.me> <vuj88g$2uahf$2@dont-email.me>
	<vujd67$335tl$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 20:23:49 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1996887"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

Am Sat, 26 Apr 2025 14:46:12 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 4/26/2025 1:22 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>> Op 26.apr.2025 om 19:28 schreef olcott:
>>> On 4/26/2025 3:58 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>> Op 25.apr.2025 om 23:21 schreef olcott:
>>>>> On 4/25/2025 8:56 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>> Am Thu, 24 Apr 2025 19:03:34 -0500 schrieb olcott:

>>>>>> The program EE(){ HHH(EE); } also halts and cannot be simulated by
>>>>>> HHH.
>>>>>>
>>>>> HHH cannot possibly do this without violating the rules of the x86
>>>>> language.
>>>> HHH already violates the rules of the x86 language by prematurely
>>>> aborting the halting program.
>>>
>>> Everyone claims that HHH violates the rules of the x86 language yet no
>>> one can point out which rules are violated
>> 
>> It has been pointed out many times. It is against the rules of the x86
>> language to abort a halting function.
> 
> You remains stupidly wrong about this because you refuse to show what
> step of DD is not emulated by HHH according to the finite string
> transformation rules specified by the x86 language.
All instructions after the abort are not emulated.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.