Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<99c2c2f44a7c8da1492c9df701cdfd70@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: No true relativist!
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 21:24:06 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <99c2c2f44a7c8da1492c9df701cdfd70@www.novabbs.com>
References: <89ea9e0a4ddc271a7bc16200c6a5dbb4@www.novabbs.com> <uC6dnQAond6lYLP6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <3c273ef12b9952ba62097af7c82733a1@www.novabbs.com> <89a6d08110a99bf650447fa73d9bd658@www.novabbs.com> <bc3734f4647fe68a89ceab454dc5c6f5@www.novabbs.com> <ba6dnaMefPZvdK36nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <0455b2b068440d558b35709f848a7457@www.novabbs.com> <tfCdnVCi-NGcg6z6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1874905"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$dNbdSe1IieTPvZADbBVrhuIyB.BBBDwK7GxrtHzG87LmNUceyFsga
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1936
Lines: 17

On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 20:57:07 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:

> On 11/10/2024 11:10 AM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>> Ross: I'm impressed by your run-on sentences and inability to make a
>> coherent argument that is brought to bear on the subject of the thread,
>> namely, the ridiculous excuse for an ad hoc rescue by relativity of the
>> Big Bang from the center of the universe.
>
> Pretty simple, the sky survey of 1920 has 99% redshift, 2024 51%.



In 2024 catalog, 101,415 galaxies with redshift of 𝑧<0.3

An Empirical Consistent Redshift Bias: A Possible Direct Observation of
Zwicky’s TL Theory

https://www.mdpi.com/2571-712X/7/3/41