Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: The Apollo moon landings
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:34:44 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <99d89bd1ed17c3e407c82a4c7ee70c74@www.novabbs.org>
References: <a16b2511c2fa4b644b5a5e19b1a6eb3c@www.novabbs.org> <102733o$3ddat$1@dont-email.me> <7ff1379c6fe15337b196f378c47b9ae8@www.novabbs.org> <1027q97$3ddat$2@dont-email.me> <1027rte$qumc$1@dont-email.me> <1029q40$3ddat$3@dont-email.me> <18d6d3fb7a4a9aef9253ab5ca5af302d@www.novabbs.org> <102cgck$1sorn$1@dont-email.me> <42d8d2afc75d79535ce21769a0d82785@www.novabbs.org> <102f3lt$28etl$1@dont-email.me> <468e2617538acf35af3512e4713ba2b6@www.novabbs.org> <kjjshl-edr21.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <18489c3276fc3ff9$101290$2064386$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="338922"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="8Ljlg8xw5cAHatvjdHGGjEHKUx9ddlqxMwQzk4UFm4k";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d6bc49351b0faa08a25d2b434d815198335a8b45
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$O7DNnUC5rXu7qP.pqqz5OeEsJcWTSKXBWgQVc1kM2sF.ftPXC8nBG

On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:09:55 +0000, Maciej Woźniak wrote:

> On 6/13/2025 5:47 AM, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 17:44:29 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>>>
>>
>> <snip old crap>
>>
>> AI was asked to evaluate person b's response to person a:
>>
>> Person A:
>>
>>>> Did Einstein make relativity famous, or did relativity make
>>>> Einstein famous?  Over decades, Einstein's reputation as a great
>>>> genius developed.  There is something appealing about an eccentric
>>>> guy with messy hair who, nevertheless, has something between his
>>>> ears that works better than what's between most people's ears...
>>>> But in 1905, Einstein wasn't famous.  Scientists didn't accept
>>>> the theory because of who wrote it.  They read and understood
>>>> the reasoning, and found it to be credible.
>>
>> Person B:
>>
>>>
>>> Nothing remotely credible about it. The whole idea was to get rid of the
>>> aether as a basic fact as aether is AUM which is a Hindu concept. So, a
>>> no-no from the Jew metaphysics forming the racist and bigoted western
>>> mindset.
>>>
>>> Tesla bitterly opposed the whole relativity nonsense so he was
>>> comprehensively persecuted by the bigoted pseudoscientific elites.
>>>
>>>
>>> WOOF woof woof-woof woof
>>>
>>> Bertietaylor
>>
>> Person B's response is problematic on multiple levels—intellectually,
>> logically, and ethically.

It is problematic for the gullible and the irrational, and all those
sans moral restraints.

> Almost like posts of person P's and those
> of other relativistic fanatics.

Apart from lying and abusing venomously they have no other strategy when
exposed as frauds.

WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

--