Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <9YCpfbWayDDTVrmI9Yye1LKiThs@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Getting there at last...
References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp> <EwNCN.10443611$ee1.4526609@fx16.ams4> <l42p7pF1fdhU1@mid.individual.net>
 <uriu05$3kjja$1@paganini.bofh.team> <l45ek0Fe0s6U1@mid.individual.net> <urobnk$3v1g$1@dont-email.me>
 <l4ak2fF7mb7U1@mid.individual.net> <1bcd63e24f9d1f35a1aa7af1b44091d2@www.novabbs.org> <l67dnaFikkfU1@mid.individual.net>
 <b6043cf438f884321bf1b6aed55f9871@www.novabbs.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: WvNW2hVGfaOr_codPk1OKhOArlg
JNTP-ThreadID: 5ipMllmo3ZDdVjvYIsvl1ofrDVs
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=9YCpfbWayDDTVrmI9Yye1LKiThs@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 24 23:49:21 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/121.0.0.0
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="601f4a4a60dc6043f0c3ab83656fd85fb6bc327d"; logging-data="2024-03-26T23:49:21Z/8793799"; posting-account="219@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Bytes: 5394
Lines: 101

Le 23/03/2024 à 21:24, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) a écrit :
> Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
>> Am 21.03.2024 um 14:05 schrieb bertitaylor:
> 
>>>>>> Sure, the increase of entropy over time is a known fact.
>>>>>> But that does not say very much about time itself, because time is
>>>>>> required for the increase of entropy in the first place.
>>>>>
>>>>> the Entropy 𝗜𝗦 time. Please stop 𝗻𝗼𝘁 undrestanding tensors. Look
>>>>> at this:
>>>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal.
>>>
>>>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution.
>>>
>>> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started
>>> talking about entropy.
> 
>> Heat transfer is possible in three different ways:
> 
>> transport of heated media (convection)
>> dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction)
>> radiation
> 
>> Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always transported by 
>> radiation.
> 
> I did not say that.  What did I say? ">> They had no clue about the radiant 
> nature of heat when they started
>>> talking about entropy." Heat engines, laws of thermodynamics (1824) antedated 
>>> Maxwell and JC Bose.
> 
> 
>>> Radiation is essentially force.
> 
>> Well, but no.
> 
> It is force all right, going by fields magnetic and electric which relate to 
> force. If we believe in aether, radiation as travelling electromagnetic waves 
> using aether medium, etc. 
> 
>> Actually you (apparently) mean 'fields' with 'essential'.
> 
> When I say heat, I mean radiant force, coming from electromagnetic fields, that 
> exert force when something material is impacted.
> 
> 
>> To call a field 'force' is totally wrong.
> 
> A field causes a force when impacted as I said. The notion of force very much 
> attends an electric field. Look up the basics, relating to classical physics.
> 
> 
> 
>> The term 'force' stems from the measurement of a field. But fields exist 
>> without measurement.
> 
> Fields are practical, not theoretical, in classical physics. What exists without 
> measurement cannot be deemed scientific. That way, unicorns, pixies, etc. exist by 
> definition with no need for measurement.
> 
> Wherever there is electric force, pushing a current, or affecting charges 
> otherwise, there has to be an electric field.
> 
> 
> 
>> So, if I decode your statement properly, you like to say, that heat 
>> transfer by radiation utilises the em-field.
> 
> No, radiation is travelling electromagnetic waves using the aether medium. 
> Wherever this radiation is obstructed, electric forces (leading to voltage 
> potentials) on the surfaces are created, creating currents, that cause the 
> sensation of heat. to humans.
> 
> In short, the em-field is not like a soccer field. It is time and space varying 
> electric field spread out from the radiator, to infinity, lessening with distance 
> with the inverse square law.
> 
>> That would be actually correct.
> 
>>> With distance it becomes nearly zero from its source.
>>> Creating the overall background radiation.
> 
>> Now you want to explain CMBR?
> 
> Easy. The fields from all the stars in the universe add up to form background 
> radiation, universal, and composed of all frequencies. They make electronic 
> oscillators possible. And nanotech too, with nanovoltages to drive nanomachines. 
> The fields from those stars at infinity are zero, most of it from the nearby stars 
> and galaxies.
> 
> bt
> 
>> I personally think, that CMBR has nothing to do with the big-bang, but 
>> is caused by the gravitational field of the Earth.
>> ....
> 
> 
>> TH

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee