Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <9a6583437121418f0b8446fd6d979461@www.novabbs.org>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<9a6583437121418f0b8446fd6d979461@www.novabbs.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: text in programming languages, Unicode in strings
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 20:48:33 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <9a6583437121418f0b8446fd6d979461@www.novabbs.org>
References: <v0s17o$2okf4$2@dont-email.me> <v2anov$11l1$2@gal.iecc.com> <2024May19.175249@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <v2df6i$3ghp4$1@dont-email.me> <v2dju2$11ed$1@gal.iecc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1614071"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="65wTazMNTleAJDh/pRqmKE7ADni/0wesT78+pyiDW8A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: ac58ceb75ea22753186dae54d967fed894c3dce8
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$xNWVwIYoMg9C8DiZMrBvB.SOna4DFY4hMvLHf4vOzGS.G14TCTLH6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2125
Lines: 28

John Levine wrote:

> According to Stephen Fuld <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid>:
>>> That may have been the idea, but I think the idea was wrong. 
>>
>>I think few would disagree with both parts of that.  I certainly
>>wouldn't.  But I give the designers some slack as, in the late 1950s,
>>there was lettle knowledge about programming languages to go on.  Now,
>>the mistake is obvious.

> COBOL is older than Fortran, and back in the day there were plenty of
> people who were outraged at I=I+1 which is mathematically absurd for
> the
> physicicts and mathematicians who were Fortran's early users.  

> Algol gave us various kinds of := which were supposed to be better.

>>Yes, the COMPUTE statement.  i.e. COMPUTE I = I + 1 

> You could do that, but I think this is at least as clear:

>      ADD 1 TO PRODUCT-INDEX.

> Don't forget that while COBOL's control structures were quite weak,
> its data structures still look pretty good.  Everything in a C or C++
> structure comes from COBOL by way of PL/I.


Picture data structures ??