Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a Smear
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 01:58:23 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <9c3ac8d323a660293da6f7cebba690be@www.novabbs.com>
References: <vc8hcj$2m25s$1@dont-email.me> <36f3431e-26fa-237c-9bd2-65aab4ead6ab@example.net> <k1qsej94763gai80npchokk267tn6v8rl1@4ax.com> <2cBHO.11661$5Cq3.2166@fx06.iad> <vcmo05$dd9$1@panix2.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2948710"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="5sGkkzIbbdADfSo2vvlQSyy6vQkiKbuCRuGoclDdANg";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$PrgFRFskB5HS4Jr9w1HCbOmSUOlxo1K2WbMdOlxEPkDjoeD4F0IKW
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 80dce3cebe7cf4e7a35bf1a47824d0d58e41b1b7
Bytes: 1790
Lines: 14

On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 15:16:21 +0000, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> Scott Lurndal <slp53@pacbell.net> wrote:

>>A common, but inaccurate statement.    Nuclear winter has nothing to
>>do with climate change, rather it's a product of nuclear war.

> But, might it not be an effective way to counter global warming while
> at the same time getting rid of people we don't like?

If they didn't have nuclear weapons of their own with which to shoot
back, yes, it would be effective. However, there might be difficulties
in calculating the right amount of this form of correction to apply,
as overshoot as well as undershoot would fail to avoid catastrophe.

John Savard