From: D <J@M>
References: <m4u2dvFq8dlU1@mid.individual.net>
 <20250331.041540.401eccfa@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
 <m52dviFh0u0U1@mid.individual.net>
 <048e0d220f1b29a056e43e7730339a29@dizum.com>
 <m52mpgFidjaU1@mid.individual.net>
Subject: Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial
 Intelligence
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <9ce3d3c5e642208c7caf6aee5a6addd1@dizum.com>
Date: Wed,  2 Apr 2025 17:30:01 +0200 (CEST)
Newsgroups: news.admin.hierarchies
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!alphared!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail
Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider
X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com
Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 2001::1/128
Bytes: 2462
Lines: 25

On 1 Apr 2025 17:41:04 GMT, Bingo3331 <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>On 01/04/25 18:19, D wrote:
>>"a.i." is certainly an intriguing theme with profound implications extending
>>far beyond computers, seems worthy of its own newsgroups, "sci.ai", "soc.ai"
>>but adding new groups or hierarchies to this quasi-dormant usenet necropolis
>>sounds more like an exercise in futility ... plain text usenet is old-school
>>which for those inclined to reading, writing, and arithmetic find preferable
>>to jetsetter, multimedia, always in a hurry to get somewhere fast lifestyles
>
>We're not asking for blind faith. Support `ai.*`, propagate the initial
> `ai.ita.*` groups, and let's see the results. Corrado Roberto (with his
> server at gatto.corradoroberto.it) is ready to handle technical setup and
> peering, ensuring minimal burden on other admins. If the groups stay empty,
> we'll reassess but if they take off, Usenet gains a vibrant new hub. It's a
> low-risk, high-reward chance to breathe life into the network.
>What do you think? Could we tweak anything names, charters, or approach--to
> address your concerns? We'd love your input to make this a win for
> everyone.
>Looking forward to your thoughts!

putting these two words together, "artificial" with "intelligence",
is counterintuitive to common sense . . . that's what's wrong with
it because if man could imitate whole planets, mercury for example,
it would surely become a "death star", a superweapon of the empire
humans weaponize everything they touch planet earth is militarized