Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<9cmdnWbz_qVxFsH7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!news.szaf.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Teilhard de Chardin - new documentary Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 15:12:44 +0000 Organization: University of Ediacara Lines: 32 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <9cmdnWbz_qVxFsH7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> References: <f23002e5-4986-4d56-b7b8-629c7495753b@gmail.com> <DoqdndzZQ7FKRMn7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <7eig5jhr59eto3qg8k6ia6qfd8nj1vqppf@4ax.com> <qMOcnSmVstgNMMX7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <7f4j5jtje5s53ht266ghj8mon5c5dp31aj@4ax.com> <rcudnQjp3-Qg1Mf7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <9k5m5jhon34ecioic0edplondkmk9cl4l5@4ax.com> <soWdnW2Rnudqocb7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <9iko5j5kl66qc0bfce3kptjlssg1fknljk@4ax.com> <0LmdnayyzofI5sH7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> <35vo5jt50185gq6b54sb86ti14dlsd4r6l@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="27909"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad) To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:O309nFECNS/s0WOhB/SdHgufosY= Return-Path: <poster@giganews.com> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id DDCFD229872; Sun, 02 Jun 2024 11:14:26 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A337D229870 for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Sun, 02 Jun 2024 11:14:24 -0400 (EDT) by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.97) for talk-origins@moderators.isc.org with esmtp (envelope-from <poster@giganews.com>) id 1sDmuf-00000002RSv-39Sa; Sun, 02 Jun 2024 17:14:25 +0200 by egress-mx.phmgmt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5334E60D04 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:11:55 +0000 (UTC) by serv-1.ord.giganews.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CA2440419 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sun, 2 Jun 2024 10:12:45 -0500 (CDT) by serv-1.i.ord.giganews.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id 452FCit8015943; Sun, 2 Jun 2024 10:12:44 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: serv-1.i.ord.giganews.com: news set sender to poster@giganews.com using -f X-Path: news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail X-NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 15:12:44 +0000 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Original-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4593 Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 02 Jun 2024 14:01:57 +0000, *Hemidactylus* > <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote: > >> Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> wrote: >>> [cutting to the quick again] >>> >>> You claim that there are a variety of types of eugenics and accuse me >>> of being one-sided in my selection of a particular type, yet you are >>> curiously reluctant to state what type of eugenics you think applies >>> to Teilhard's ideas and why you think it does apply. >>> >>> Feel free to come back to me when your hand gets tired waving, and you >>> are prepared to state what you actually think. >>> >> Maybe you should start by admitting, given the evidence of the many quotes >> you have been provided of Teilhard himself, that Teilhard was actually >> incorporating eugenics into his evolutionary philosophy and stop squirting >> squid ink to cloud that issue. > > So you don't want to explain what *you* mean by eugenics but you want > me to agree that Teilhard subscribed to it anyway. I suggest you need > to stand back and reflect on your line of argument here. > Regardless of type Teilhard was incorporating eugenics. Slattery was focused on the negative type with sterilization and you are too. I am looking at it more broadly and maybe extending Teilhard the benefit of the doubt, that he was incorporating a positive type instead, unless it can be shown otherwise. Again I am backing away from Slattery’s polemics as he may have taken his critique too far. But positive eugenics ain’t that great either.