Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:11:51 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <9d2dd0b09344d2a7f72c8c542d5c3fe043bc6043@i2pn2.org>
References: <vb0lkb$1c1kh$2@dont-email.me> <vb1hdi$1feme$1@dont-email.me>
 <vb4erg$2s0uc$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:11:52 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="602294"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <vb4erg$2s0uc$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1799
Lines: 25

On 9/2/24 9:33 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 9/1/2024 5:58 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-09-01 03:04:43 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>> *I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases*
>>>
>>> knowledge is a justified true belief such that the
>>> justification is sufficient reason to accept the
>>> truth of the belief.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem
>>
>> The remaining loophole is the lack of an exact definition
>> of "sufficient reason".
>>
> 
> Ultimately sufficient reason is correct semantic
> entailment from verified facts.
> 
> 

But is something that you can't KNOW to be true.

You demonstate this property perfectly. Your claim to "verified facts" 
that are just incorrect proves that we have a problem trying to have a 
actual working and usable definition of knowledge.