Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Energy is for bunny-ahs (traders)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:34:19 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <9gee1l-kkkj.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <730c4a156bd268ae1f9342119eb1ff2e@www.novabbs.com> <vi007m$1ar8b$1@dont-email.me> <5c265c0d6012a26abb9caa981e60323a@www.novabbs.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:46:11 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c7784d8988913682ec5cc8136455f308";
	logging-data="2962395"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/NGMDwNC6/1NhWtcW06SQw"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-126-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:omeNI+LijLJouig5xeENyytt+58=
Bytes: 1998

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:53:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
> 
>> On 11/24/24 04:14, Bertietaylor wrote:
>>> Physics texts should avoid the word "energy" as much as possible.
>>>
>>> It is an unscientific term as it is so volatile and relative.
>>>
>>> Besides the so called law of conservation of energy is nonsense as shown
>>> by the phenomenon of radioactivity. Explaining that with e=mcc is even
>>> more nonsense.
>>>
>>> High time the world quitted bad physics and followed Arindam's physics
>>> that updates Newton and rejects Einstein.
>>
>> If you reject conservation of energy and conservation of momentum
>> you are shredding Newton, not updating him.
> 
> Nonsense. Newton had nothing to do with such a ridiculous notion as law
> of conservation of energy. That came from the German scientists like
> Helmholtz.

Actually the notion originated before Newton was born, crackpot.

<snip delusional nonsense>