Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Cuomo Recants on Ivermectin
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 16:49:20 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 61
Message-ID: <9gph5jhqpo696l47upj3s4erjercndika7@4ax.com>
References: <7fqcnaOYXPhO48r7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> <v3a3do$1nurk$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-D790D2.09021830052024@news.giganews.com> <v3abh6$1p68a$2@dont-email.me> <_hGdnR09YZZiWsX7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <85jh5j55as32kh4jt2n07po7h7lnqcen06@4ax.com> <v3amlq$1r705$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 22:49:21 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="78e65926bdefb420c29692dbe3b7efb2";
	logging-data="1951634"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18wb4dhwcbH6/PEhRzxzIYhh4yN5O7NPwo="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q/GLz3K0LFQ7De2YSBXoAQouNJM=
Bytes: 4025

On Thu, 30 May 2024 16:13:45 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:

>On 5/30/2024 3:05 PM, shawn wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 18:39:59 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On May 30, 2024 at 10:03:33 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/30/2024 12:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>   In article <v3a3do$1nurk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>   wrote:
>>>>>   
>>>>>>   On 5/29/24 3:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>   
>>>>>>>   Fired CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, who, along with the rest of the media,
>>>>>>>   mocked and derided anyone taking Ivermectin (remember how they called
>>>>>>>   it "horse paste"?) to treat the Wuhan Flu is singing a different tune
>>>>>>>   now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=902
>>>>>   
>>>>>>   Yeah. He's not on CNN any more, and can be as crazy as he wants.
>>>>>   
>>>>>   LOL! It's hilarious how the Left considers these guys the sages of our
>>>>>   modern age until they say something to counter the Agenda, then they're
>>>>>   immediately branded batshit crazy and dismissed.
>>>>>   
>>>>>>   He just indicated that RFK Jr. should be at the debate.
>>>>>   
>>>>>   He should be if he has a significant amount of support.
>>>>
>>>> The "significance" of RFK's support is that it could sink Biden, and not
>>>> even remotely that it could elect RFK.
>>>
>>> "Bad for Biden" is not a reason to exclude a candidate from a debate.
>>>
>> 
>> No, but it is a reason why many may be glad he is excluded. If for no
>> other reason then it would take time away from the two candidates who
>> actually do have a real chance of being elected President of the USA.
>> What is a good reason to exclude him is if he can't reach the terms
>> required of the debate. I'm not sure what terms are in place now but
>> in the past I believe a candidate needed to be reaching around 15-16%
>> in various polls to be considered as a participant in the debates.
>> Something that RFK Jr isn't able to do.
>> 
>> My two cents is I would sort of like to have him in a real debate if
>> only to demonstrate some of his ideas to the populace. Which I would
>> think would either attract some of the weaker Trump supporters or
>> cause people to decide not to vote for RFK Jr. I know people talk
>> about him drawing support from Biden but I'm not that sure it would
>> happen if people saw more of RFK Jr.
>
>If it could be shown RFK Jr.'s not a complete nutter (a meme I haven't 
>personally vetted), I'd certainly vote for him over the other two in a 
>potentially close contest -- but that's not what we have.
>

In a full on debate I don't think that's possible. In a limited
discussion RFK Jr comes off as perfectly competent, but I think when
you get into a wider discussion the crazy bits begin to show.