Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <9hlOUodP8C-awRfUyYwo5eBs1Ec@jntp>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<9hlOUodP8C-awRfUyYwo5eBs1Ec@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <9hlOUodP8C-awRfUyYwo5eBs1Ec@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Sync two clocks
References: <u18wy1Hl3tOo1DpOF6WVSF0s-08@jntp> <v9nant$1d2us$1@dont-email.me> <vPP1Z1BJfE1Dt7SYhCzEo7ZQWFI@jntp>
 <va0a4f$30p95$1@dont-email.me> <Zwwc8OsxqpAwTzvPkie6NmgxmY8@jntp> <ad1be0767d67933777b11e63154fbbaa@www.novabbs.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: WXCeL_n7qx-conYh_7HaqUsbeuw
JNTP-ThreadID: KqCy9G15x7A9xZN_JLsoNRe49xU
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=9hlOUodP8C-awRfUyYwo5eBs1Ec@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 24 00:35:42 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-20T00:35:42Z/8993276"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From:  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr>
Bytes: 2728
Lines: 25

Le 20/08/2024 à 01:33, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:15:28 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

> If tAB = tBA, then Paul's procedure works.  If tAB <> tBA,
> then your point M method won't work either.

 If we synchronize on an abstract point M placed at an equal distance from 
A, B, C, D, E, we obtain for E a plane of the present time where A, B, C, 
D and E are simultaneously located.
Let's admit that M sends them an electromagnetic signal, and upon 
reception, they start beeping every quarter of an hour.
For M, the beeps will be simultaneous.
They are synchronized on M, and nothing else.
It is a fierce belief, among men to believe in the Holy Virgin, in the 
flying horse of Muhammad, and in universal isochrony, and it is very 
difficult to discourage them from thinking that A, B, C, D, E are 
synchronous with each other FOR THEM.
No, they are only for M.
The universal present does not exist!!!
I repeat again, even if it must be said with knees in the testicles, and 
big slaps in the snout.
"Your stupid present tense doesn't exist." I will never understand this 
blockage for a concept that I thought was understandable for an 
eleven-year-old child, and which seems to block everyone.

R.H.