Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <9mrYetkghLXwIcwZUl4c8b3LTKI@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <43e0a1be4a7921eb043acb58d1168ee1@www.novabbs.com> <Kaxl44IyggMeO7Ao3IslDanrquQ@jntp>
 <1b0910c819bb031839b21557a19c75be@www.novabbs.com> <_hiIkN_NB6Jm2XOJZeHK7Fy9L2E@jntp>
 <1f081cbe82f7c86f1463b0bf5ad957a9@www.novabbs.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: 021F2tG5toa5X0dbLdSTCwRc2eo
JNTP-ThreadID: XgGFOrcTXd5ZDEX07aa-LTy0U04
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=9mrYetkghLXwIcwZUl4c8b3LTKI@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 24 17:08:01 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-15T17:08:01Z/8949572"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
Bytes: 2438
Lines: 35

Le 15/07/2024 à 18:12, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:55:23 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

>> To=(x/c).sqrt(1+2c²/ax)

>> No, he is a relativist like Hachel, and uses a different geometry for
>> space and time problems.
> 
> And wrong.

 Prove? 

>> Example: what is the formula giving the instantaneous speed of uniformly
>> accelerated objects?
>> Voi/c=[1+c²/2ax]^-(1/2)
>> This formula does not exist either in Newton or Einstein.
> 
> And does not describe anything in the universe.

 No, YOU, you say that this formula does not describe anything in the 
universe.
> 
>> Another example: transformations into rotating frames of reference.
>>
>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?_hiIkN_NB6Jm2XOJZeHK7Fy9L2E@jntp/Data.Media:1>
>>
>> These transformations do not exist neither in Newton nor in Einstein.
>>
>> R.H.
> 
> And do not describe anything in the universe. 

 Idem. YOU, you say that...

 R.H.