Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<AN2dnc6sH6A292T6nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 19:16:59 +0000
From: "shades@cov.net.inv" <seeu@nt.net>
Subject: Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
References: <67EF682D.135A@ix.netcom.com> <86a58p8lgf.fsf@example.com>
 <CvidnQ-_Kr5gPmv6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 20:16:14 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CvidnQ-_Kr5gPmv6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <AN2dnc6sH6A292T6nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com>
Lines: 33
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-75Zwwp7I9XPYfk4D6MOurTyrXHyjS1N8sSmJR+wDW5Zc1O4dlWD26LgPtjEJfjb/PptQvPXfNIP/F01!6VhTgBfuUfUuPttIw8bxIgS2AmmbguKgkwPSgrgfjD+eWkWil5ppSg3RP2H/OkSWTIuPtsW9V80=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2696

Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 04/09/2025 07:21 AM, Richmond wrote:
>> What does 'exist' mean? Why suppose that it was ever possible for
>> nothing to exist?
>>
> 
> Well it can follow from consideration or contemplation/deliberation
> itself: on the universal, vis-a-vis the void, that there are examples
> since antiquity like 'nature abhors a vacuum', about creation and
> destruction vis-a-vis conservation, that considering "nothing" is
> the same as considering "everything".
> 
> It's sort of like when a given thing, is, everything that it is not.
> 
> 
> Then, this gets into things like why there's a principle of inversion
> instead of a principle of (non-)contradiction, that's sort of been
> a usual idea since antiquity, the principle of non-contradiction,
> yet instead, a principle of inversion can see that arrive and
> for reason and rationality and according to nature and reality.
> 
> So, really it's a question to answer for yourself, where though
> the usual "fundamental question of metaphysics" is "why is there
> something rather than nothing", then there's quite a bit of the
> canon and dogma and doctrine about it, to make inter-subjective
> accounts, vis-a-vis, usual personal individual ponderings.
> 
> 
> Anyways there's an idea that the universe exists simply because

-----------------------------------

It exists because God created it.