Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <AVa827R_LOez7mc5Ad3CT6GyhiA@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Space-time interval (2)
References: <YqTjbAPdSf8P-veYFHQCI8eskLU@jntp> <v9dmer$3dtvr$3@dont-email.me> <3lzcd1NKCT13xkV8yvlh8oaa3Mg@jntp>
 <v9fdeg$3rh2a$1@dont-email.me> <jBxUcP6BzIhx3lL1WyQctHmm7jo@jntp> <v9g6ij$3vsfg$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: JDnjggmWXe91vVwB4LfiwAOkdhk
JNTP-ThreadID: L0IgA2CWtv7gPeDAAk57TJ-BbeQ
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=AVa827R_LOez7mc5Ad3CT6GyhiA@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 24 22:01:19 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-13T22:01:19Z/8985947"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From:  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr>
Bytes: 6317
Lines: 118

Le 13/08/2024 à 19:53, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
> 
> So you have given up gesticulating about universal anisochrony
> and why that makes it impossible to have synchronous clocks
> in Oslo and Paris?
> 
> Try to explain it again?
> 
> |> Den 22.07.2024 21:37, skrev Paul.B.Andersen:
> |>>
> |>> You know of course that all clocks in the same time zone
> |>> are synchronous. In France and Norway clocks are currently
> |>> showing UTC + 2 hour, so my clock and your clock are actually
> |>> synchronous.
> |>>
> |>> Please explain why our clocks are NOT synchronous.
> |>> (To within few seconds|
> |
> 
> |> Den 22.07.2024 23:55, Richard Hachel responded:>
> |>> But I keep explaining it to you.
> |>>
> |>> This is a property of space that can be called universal anisochrony.
> |>>
> |>> This does not translate into the idea that the “plan of present time”
> |>> so dear to physicists does not exist, it is a thought that seems
> |>> logical to them, but it is an abstract thought.
> |>>
> 
> Let's assume that both clocks show UTC + 2h within a second.
> 
> I leave Oslo Airport (Gardemoen Airport) when the watch on
> the airport shows 12.00.00 ± 1 s
> I arrive at Paris Airport (Charles De Gaulle Airport) when
> the watch on the airport shows 13.30.32 ± 1 s.
> The difference is T = 1h 30m 32 ± 2 s
> The distance in the ground frame between the airports is
> L = 1358.03 ± 0.1 km
> 
> v = T/L = 250.01 ± 0.11 m/s = 900.0 ± 0.4 km/h
> 
> Please explain why this is not a real speed
> in the ground frame.
> 
> Richard, will you flee yet again? :-D

No, no, I am not trying to escape. I have forty years of relativistic 
concepts behind me, and I have a perfect grasp of how things should be 
taught.
There are several keys to understanding RR, and either none of these keys 
are understood, or they are half understood, and that is not satisfactory.
The first key, which is absolutely necessary to open the theory, is the 
notion of universal anisochrony.
This made a lot of people laugh 40 years ago, because people did not 
understand this term, nor what I meant by it.
Today, it is a little less funny, and many ask me to explain it in a 
simple way, because the concept, although elementary, is not obvious to 
everyone.
What is universal anisochrony?
It is a property of space, just as universal gravitation is a property of 
bodies.
This means that the notion of absolute universal present is an abstract 
thought.
There is no present moment at this moment that is at the level of a planet 
that orbits Altair, for example, and that corresponds reciprocally to my 
present moment.
In short, the notion of a flat present does not exist.
It is a thought anchored in man (like the flat earth before), but which is 
only a human a priori.
Strangely, this simple idea, which corresponds perfectly to an intelligent 
physics, is abandoned by men, while they understand very well a more 
difficult concept which is the relativity of the internal chronotropy of 
watches by change of inertial reference (gamma factor).

We come back to Paris, and to Oslo.

There is therefore a natural anisochrony between Paris and Oslo.

There is no "flat present", "horizontal plane of present time" between 
Paris and Oslo. I repeat, it is useless, false and abstract.

So there is a natural, irreversible gap between the two. If we synchronize 
the watches on Paris, an event that will occur in Oslo will not exist for 
Paris.

An event that will occur in Paris will not exist in Oslo.

This event is only found in the "future of the other".

And so on for the entire universe.

We will always have a time interval, an anisochrony,

which will be related to the distance.

"My present is not your present, and your present is not my present, there 
is no absolute universal simultaneity"

So how do we make all this agree anyway?

We will create a universal time, an abstract universal present, which does 
not exist, and which corresponds to a synchronization made by an observer 
placed in a fourth spatial dimension which does not exist, but which is 
very useful, because mathematically,
if it is placed very far, perpendicular, and at an equal distance
from all the points of the three-dimensional metric universe which is 
ours, it observes all the points in a constant perfect simultaneity.

This point is abstract, does not exist, but allows us to use a universal 
time and a perfect present time plan.

But this perfect present time does not exist.

This does not prevent that in our universe, each point considered is, in 
general at a different distance from me, and that it is impossible for me 
to synchronize with it, without desynchronizing myself from it, and 
without desynchronizing myself from the others and so on.

R.H.