Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <AwNHa33OTto93tgHGw_X4ucJZ-Y@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Getting there at last...
References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp> <1bcd63e24f9d1f35a1aa7af1b44091d2@www.novabbs.org> <l67dnaFikkfU1@mid.individual.net>
 <b6043cf438f884321bf1b6aed55f9871@www.novabbs.org> <9YCpfbWayDDTVrmI9Yye1LKiThs@jntp> <l6kfsfFjqknU2@mid.individual.net>
 <WuhuOl-fQu3J7ho5vcxwxFwmlEQ@jntp> <l6puenFeh5pU1@mid.individual.net> <bigu1zNUD9n8JIWm2zHpTNzxgBQ@jntp>
 <l71kmnFje11U1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: KIgRoFWcbakMxe-38yT4R-cDoMo
JNTP-ThreadID: 5ipMllmo3ZDdVjvYIsvl1ofrDVs
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=AwNHa33OTto93tgHGw_X4ucJZ-Y@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 24 07:38:40 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/121.0.0.0
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="601f4a4a60dc6043f0c3ab83656fd85fb6bc327d"; logging-data="2024-04-02T07:38:40Z/8802419"; posting-account="219@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Bytes: 11464
Lines: 257

Le 02/04/2024 à 16:51, Thomas Heger a écrit :
> Am 30.03.2024 um 11:38 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>> Le 30/03/2024 à 18:48, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>> Am 28.03.2024 um 08:09 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe you like my 'book'
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> TH
>>>>
>>>>  From your book, the following quote
>>>> ***
>>>> This project was started as a search for the connection between QM and
>>>> GR. The connection was hypothesized and assumed to exist (without
>>>> knowing it's specific features), since nature has to be understood as an
>>>> undivided system. So all theories should describe the same world, but
>>>> possibly different aspects. Spacetime is a physical system, hence should
>>>> be build out of 'elements' (what are the 'building blocks'). ***
>>>>
>>>> Any connection between two theoretical (conjectural, impractical as yet)
>>>> notions as QM and GR must necessarily be theoretical as well.
>>>
>>> Sure.
>>>
>>> If you try to find a way between to spots (let's call them 'QM' and
>>> 'GR'), you need to assume, those spots do in fact exist.
>>>
>>> It's not the duty of the pathfinder, to prove the existence of the two
>>> endpoints of the way found.
>>>
>>> If there is actually nothing at these positions, it's actually not his
>>> fault.
>>>
>>>> In theory, the Moon is green cheese with cows jumping over it.
>>>
>>> No, not really. At least I've never heard of such a theory.
>>>
>>>> People were burnt to death for not believing that the stars moved in
>>>> crystal spheres, and the stars were holes in those spheres to let
>>>> heavenly light in.
>>>
>>> Well, that's not quite true, neither.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, the catholic church had killed several scientists in
>>> the middle ages, but not because of their discoveries, but because
>>> they were questioning the authority of the church.
>>>
>>> That authority was meant to be absolute and ANY disobedience could be
>>> punished by death.
>>>
>>> This has changed significantly and today the pope does not intervene
>>> in physics anymore.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The justification for QM and GR as practical let alone scientific is not
>>>> there.
>>>
>>> Well, yes, because that was NOT my topic.
>>>
>>>> While there is charm in seeing the moon as green cheese with cows
>>>> jumping around it, and there is profit in all the heaven stuff, I see
>>>> neither pleasure nor profit from QM and GR, save for the careerists and
>>>> their dupes blown by math mumbo-jumbo. I know this is the most powerful
>>>> nonsense ever to be globally accepted, in our times, and that deserves
>>>> respect.
>>>
>>> You may rightfully critizise QM and GR, and in a way I would
>>> understand you, but this was not the subject of my 'book'.
>>>
>>>> Those really into physics better study my videos and texts relating to
>>>> physics. The US Navy, I find, has appropriated my new design rail gun
>>>> for their ships. The Chinese are using a version of that to launch their
>>>> warplanes from navy carriers. Facebook is so useful, to present new
>>>> discoveries and inventions, and see how they get stolen.
>>>
>>> You invented the railgun? ? ? ?
>>
>> Yes, I invented a new design railgun, where the bullet is heavy,
>> perpendicular to the rails, and the voltage is low. Overall, this design
>> is 10-100 more efficient than the earlier rail guns of the US as shown
>> in their pre 2015 videos. So it is practical and has been known since my
>> first paper on it in 2013. I showed that to my PhD supervisor in 2015,
>> and I suspect that it was transmitted to the relevant people from that
>> time. In 2017 I published the details of the invention in a series of
>> youtube videos.
>> My idea behind my PhD work (btw I am not a PhD as in the final viva they
>> said I had not made a working model of a rail gun, which was not what my
>> supervisor had been saying) was to show that the Lorentz force
>> accelerating the bullet had no ELECTRICAL reaction.  (Since I have used
>> a rolling bullet/armature in my videos, there is apparently some
>> reaction but that is mechanical, due to the treadmill effect.) My
>> detailed analysis shows inertia violation.
> 
> I had always thought, that my 'book' was 'revolutionary'.
> 
> But your research is far more revolutionary than mine.

The research period was from 1998 - 2015.  It is development time now.  
Thanks very much.
> 
> So, hope the best for you, but see trouble ahead, because you are 
> stepping on a lot of feet.

Never a truer word was said.  I am glad that at least one physicist in the 
universe is not mocking or ignoring me.  That is a start.
> 
> It's interesting, anyhow.

Well, it will take a lot of money to make a working prototype of an 
internal force machine that will replace all rockets and jet engines.
How I can earn that money, is my present concern.  Let us see if my next 
project (making a very cheap "free energy" drive) works as my 
maths/intuition says is should. I have found no patents for that, and that 
is good.
> 
> btw: I had 'published' my 'book' as google doc presentation, which 
> worked quite well.

My book "To the Stars" was published in Jan 2000 in my new "adda" website. 
I presented my new formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) to explain mass and energy 
relationships on a kinetic and non-destructive basis. It got some 
attention when in 2003 there was a global news release about this work 
relating to updating Newtonian laws, with deliberate inertia violation 
using Lorentz force, it that had no reaction.  Had I been taken seriously 
then, we would have been making daily trips to the Moon by now, and 
gearing up for space mining, etc.

Unfortunately for "modern physicists", as I right (from my inertia 
violation experiments) they are all wrong. I don't expect them to like 
being wrong, so resistance from their side is to be expected.  I can only 
appeal to their commitment to the scientific method, which has it that all 
knowledge is provisional, and so subject to revision or expulsion.

Look at the gains. Burning all the e=mcc=hv stuff and updating physics 
will create plenty of jobs for physicists and engineers, for all time to 
come!  No end of learning and finding, with new machines always going for 
new things.  Why stick to the old and rotten, the senseless and the 
constricting? May truth overcome the cunning of the globally established 
liars. With my physics, the universe gets infinite like human potential. 
Courage!

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ

***

Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0

Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into near 
space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s

and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating inertia 
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========