Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<B4adnRC-g5XlAar7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 05 May 2024 14:49:28 +0000 Subject: Re: Scalar waves Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <l96663F16l9U1@mid.individual.net> <Me6dnRr7rMaN6rP7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <l98megFchp8U1@mid.individual.net> <TeednX5uuvbrPbL7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> <l9bfe7FpedoU1@mid.individual.net> <1qsvg5a.x7fj8618ybjpgN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <l9jg4jF18vjU2@mid.individual.net> <8P-dna9th8kfy6v7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <l9oliuFofc9U4@mid.individual.net> <Kd2dnZlhr5q6Dar7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 07:49:40 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <Kd2dnZlhr5q6Dar7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <B4adnRC-g5XlAar7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 102 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-z0qo/jfRLcpTT33J2unImROkZGNrozclqlTxj/yaLr/xnxx8rKoaZciyOSVSsNk18cT8BbgWoNphQY5!K781Imc/07BkyuVkEZbBIObky3fpXWbZwlCdzDHOOCZPiP8t1U4BcMjCwDTgCVFS/0dz+UA0pg== X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 5830 On 05/05/2024 06:56 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 05/04/2024 11:00 PM, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am Samstag000004, 04.05.2024 um 17:38 schrieb Ross Finlayson: >> >>> Consider the length of a body vis-a-vis the distance it >>> travels: both in units of length, yet distance as only >>> after a derivation of all the higher orders of acceleration >>> and deceleration whether it results a distance at rest, or, >>> a distance marking motion, that the other factors of the >>> dimensional analysis, go along with it, though algebraically, >>> at each point dimensionless. >>> >> >> A physical system has attributes. >> >> These attributes can be measured. >> >> The measure of this measurement has a dimension and a value. >> >> >> The pyhsical system is space in this case. >> >> In this space we have two points, which are somehow identifiable. >> >> The distance is the length of a connecting streight line. >> >> This length has the dimension 'length', which is quantified by >> approriate units (meters in case of SI-units). >> >> So the measure of that distance has a certain value (say 2) and certain >> units (meters) and a certain dimension (length). >> >> >> TH > > Space has a metric and a norm, this of course makes for > all the application of triangle or Cauchy/Schwartz inequality, > which is used throughout the application of tensor products, > what results that the vectors after tensors, > are commensurable (measurable together). > > Saying that distance-measurable and distance-measured, > or distance-measurable and distance-traveled, > have different implicit units yet same explicit units, > has that the units come and go in the derivation, > the "dimensionless" implicits and "dimensioned" explicits. > > The sum-of-histories sum-of-potentials, is an idea that > all the notions of least-action and so on just result > that state is sum-of-histories, and the gradient is sum-of-potentials. > > (This is the gradient that's the geodesy the world-lines.) > > > Many empirical settings start to require this extra book-keeping > of the derivations and their implicits, while that each formula > or step of the derivation the system of equations or system of > inequalities is readable in its "least" dimensioned units, the > derivation indicates also the "implicit" dimensioned units. > > Then as with regards to which of those are negligeable, > is for all the higher orders of acceleration, > of which of those that all above are zero. > > > So, the singular and its branches > and non-linear and multi-pole, > and even the plain starting/stopping > and stop/walk and run/pause, > have this sort of fuller dimensional analysis, > about dimensional/dimensionless resonator/alternator, > that mathematically book-keeps the moments of the motion. > > I've been studying this in my recent podcasts, > see "Moment and Motion" under "Philosophical Foreground", > recently about "vis-motrix" and "vis-viva", > and about Einstein's goal of understanding classical motion. > > - https://www.youtube.com/@rossfinlayson > > It's a field theory, it's a gauge theory, it has an "R" gauge, > "R" for "Real". > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz-c4UcaBcA&list=PLb7rLSBiE7F4eHy5vT61UYFR7_BIhwcOY&index=29 "Acceleration, mechanics, interaction, higher-order acceleration, motion and rest, continuity, hologram universe, Mach, physical quantities, point to total, dp/dt, dv/dt, change in time, dimensional analysis, immovable and unstoppable, dimensioned quantities, algebra and units, implicits and implicit zero, reaching and finding equilibrium, dimensional dynamics analysis, the un-linear, connection of cascade and carriage, linearity of units of momentum and units in inertia, higher-order linearity, complex and harmonic analysis, dimensional resonator, Lucretius and Polybius, Aristotle's science of physics, a place to stand, Aristotle's platonism, Feynman's notes, configuration and energy of experiment, forces and the classical limit, independence of coordinates, stop-derivative, dimensional resonance, book-keeping, momentum phase and phase momentum, Cerenkov and Brehmsstrahlung, Huygens principle and boom angle, d'Espagnat on objectivity, re-flux."