Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <B9RvJ_JJAW_9cP9mjTUPbWv7Nds@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <db885c7c1e1a5bfdf60e90fa9882bfb73b4e6ce7@i2pn2.org>
 <eY2Memk56jLKsrTeR3kBDQQqfHI@jntp> <bdfbb725-7fc3-4e17-b09b-4d6191d301a5@att.net> <tvUGDEKZBjBIOn4R0HIJvG5es4k@jntp>
 <d921df64d59a0bcdd17b4df10452e1b80df52a63@i2pn2.org> <bzKSpxSf9uNp5CqHyyYXjN1qFJg@jntp>
 <eca2fc989ec057bba94c874e86af6e33d8987f89@i2pn2.org> <dbDJOjuZlR22ACs9b5j_GQZcXac@jntp>
 <45161659cef1b38d7abd3c0e7cc42d8f825954f9@i2pn2.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: QP6R7t1JYLXdDYQUGjy-1KLz1vo
JNTP-ThreadID: KFm3f7lT2HjaTSiMfnv5xqZoSBw
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=B9RvJ_JJAW_9cP9mjTUPbWv7Nds@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 24 13:08:14 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="82b75c1d0a83e677ff646b52485f72f8b23749df"; logging-data="2024-08-30T13:08:14Z/9005893"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Bytes: 2641
Lines: 35

Le 30/08/2024 à 03:09, Richard Damon a écrit :
> On 8/29/24 9:27 AM, WM wrote:
>> Le 29/08/2024 à 01:48, Richard Damon a écrit :
>>> On 8/28/24 8:57 AM, WM wrote:
>>>> Le 28/08/2024 à 04:13, Richard Damon a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well NUF(x) does not exist, but that doesn't say that infinity is 
>>>>> not actual,
>>>>
>>>> So the unit fractions are actually existing but their number isn't? 
>>>> Strange!
>>>
>>> There number exists, it is aleph_0.
>>>
>>> You just can't count them from the "end" that doesn't have an end.
>> 
>> Why not?
>> 
> Because you can't start at an end that isn't there.

0 is below the end. Hence there is an end.
> 
> Try to tell me the actual number you are going to start at.

I start with NUF(0) = 0.
> 
> Logic that depends on the existance of something that doesn't exist is 
> just broken.

Mathematics is the science which allows to prove things which cannot be 
seen.

Regards, WM