Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <BH4xs8rjWMdN15I1rhXjw7nMXx4@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <4404fd8d88a2eacd658d92efeef4d6c2@www.novabbs.com>
 <vm3ncs$20493$1@dont-email.me> <7db98cab57f6050f8daf2f88b9bfdcdb@www.novabbs.com> <vm6lel$2jd9o$1@dont-email.me>
 <4568ec448c26221aea0c57a6bfc7b29b@www.novabbs.com> <vm8bd2$2v29k$1@dont-email.me>
 <5705554ddaf14095a8c1720c33efc599@www.novabbs.com> <vmblgh$3kl6v$1@dont-email.me>
 <181b42b814b94f1d$84581$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: BmPFh3LCHiBgnZO9LC_PAoAVbJU
JNTP-ThreadID: 4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=BH4xs8rjWMdN15I1rhXjw7nMXx4@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 25 19:25:01 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="a1ab45c8cb7e64a1a149afc283e9def002910221"; logging-data="2025-01-16T19:25:01Z/9177116"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <jp@python.invalid>
Bytes: 2847
Lines: 35

Le 16/01/2025 à 20:23, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 16.01.2025 o 20:11, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
>> Den 15.01.2025 18:36, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>>> On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:00:31 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I ask you again:
>>>> Why do you not understand that Einstein and many other physicists
>>>> have shown that it is a fact that GR predicts Θ = 4GM/Δ⋅c² ?
>>>>
>>>> Your opinion of GR is irrelevant.
>>>>
>>>> GR's prediction for the gravitational deflection
>>>> is confirmed by a number of experiments:
>>>>
>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Hipparcos.pdf
>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini.pdf
>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Shapiro_2004.pdf
>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Fomalont.pdf
>>>> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini_2.pdf
>>>>
>>>> You know, experimental evidence _is_ the reality.
>>>> Your opinion is fantasy.
>> 
>>> If the derivation is wrong, it doesn't predict. You didn't understand
>>> what Poor said. Poor has directly addressed the "4" in your equation.
>> 
>> Understand this:
>> The equation Θ = 4GM/Δ⋅c² is correct
> 
> A pity it's not [GR] equation for
> light deflection.

Really? So what is it?