| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<BROdnUXrYqf2fHH7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:43:55 +0000 Subject: Re: E. Noether contra B. Carter Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <bf9ca72acb304865dcc1c4054f751c82@www.novabbs.com> <3c156c017ba1999a490e923aedbda74e@www.novabbs.com> <DGKdnQ0lZaQgBnH7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:43:58 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <DGKdnQ0lZaQgBnH7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <BROdnUXrYqf2fHH7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 38 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-eLMp5qyIopRdHBAHtA7MlNUP67+X/Y3KODv5y1FLke0Ki/hjatpQe2Vf3N4RyiPdZVl5eSH9LDpxsOZ!bSDvnZpaBHgNzgwTSbAWdFKrsSwL3PJAE8oo4/HtQxt9JAvFO8g8caU/aa2oMZUKv9rFTMebJh0W X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2640 On 09/19/2024 02:46 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 09/18/2024 03:16 PM, JanPB wrote: >> BTW, I have no idea why the lines are wrapped so badly. >> It never happened before. >> >> -- >> Jan > > I was reading some theory in the spectral analysis > of molecular weights, and they get into a similar > sort of ansaetze with regards to the quantities. > > There where for example you get small-angle > approximation and the nil-square and Laplacian, > instead they have resonance theory and molecular chemistry. > > So it's sort of like you're missing a constant, or term, > sort of like the cosmological constant, which of course > everybody knows as both vanishing yet non-zero. > > I.e., it's sort of like your linearisations and > dimensionless analysis, have sort of resulted > that your coordinate mapping has not-enough-information. > > Anyways other fields have similar sorts of setups > and have made do with more sorts of non-linear > and non-standard analysis, yet what all works up > just fine as resonance theory as more than the > sum of harmonic functions, or that Laplacians > don't look good from every angle. > > https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01412752 "The idea of consistently averaging the hydrodynamic interaction and its various consequences for Hookean dumbbells are reviewed."