Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<BjqdnU25wMan36P6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:10:33 +0000
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
Newsgroups: sci.math
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vh76bi$3bnde$1@dont-email.me>
 <d90452a5-965b-443f-9146-96cdf9b3906c@att.net> <vh8ft0$3jqb5$3@dont-email.me>
 <vh8g5e$3juug$1@dont-email.me> <vh8otd$3lhlt$2@dont-email.me>
 <vhb1is$6hbv$2@dont-email.me> <vhb1mu$6hbv$4@dont-email.me>
 <vhb32t$7ese$1@dont-email.me> <vhch7n$hge9$2@dont-email.me>
 <vhcieh$jjk5$1@dont-email.me> <vhcjg5$hdd4$3@dont-email.me>
 <vhckkh$k32g$1@dont-email.me> <vhcp0r$hge9$6@dont-email.me>
 <vhd7d7$nt37$1@dont-email.me> <vhd9lq$obb0$1@dont-email.me>
 <883377b7ebbd9d5d528db048daf9f682e3854ae8@i2pn2.org>
 <vhdfu1$p3fg$2@dont-email.me> <vhdlgc$qod3$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhfrnd$1adlc$2@dont-email.me> <vhfsfu$1bgpj$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhfuta$1adlc$3@dont-email.me> <vhgd02$1ep1p$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhge3n$1eu67$1@dont-email.me> <vhgfec$1f6mn$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhi8c0$1sjsn$1@dont-email.me> <vhif1d$1u4gp$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhkj2p$25fe$1@dont-email.me> <vhkqs7$4jg8$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhl4lk$5q4u$1@dont-email.me> <vhlfel$8hr6$1@dont-email.me>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 12:10:36 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <vhlfel$8hr6$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <BjqdnU25wMan36P6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 46
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-Fu7QDWfroYwvLLzL4LYO0EZMKtGSY1g6dmq18+3PXrTbnqYdtpwSiWoIb0LyBfBv901a0c77x/yKc9Y!/gYO72ocE8dbMxQH5g8cmle/y1S3RVqc/HC+OROxqrJkWECktJBIUgsrlLGGw2/eMqqkn7BdKmjO!iQ==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3839

On 11/20/2024 12:05 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
> WM wrote on 11/20/2024 :
>> On 20.11.2024 15:14, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> WM formulated on Wednesday :
>>
>>>>
>>>> It does not make it wrong, but it unmasks it at imprecise. That's
>>>> why I don't like it. We can do better.
>>>
>>> It works well enough.
>>
>> Really? Then you can answer the following questions:
>>
>> Let every unit interval after a natural number on the real axis be
>> coloured white with exception of the powers of 2 which are coloured
>> black. Is it possible to shift the black intervals so that the whole
>> real axis becomes black?
>
> No, of course not.
>
>> Or: Let every unit interval after a natural number on the real axis be
>> coloured as above with exception of the intervals after the odd prime
>> numbers which are coloured red. Is it possible to shift the red
>> intervals so that the whole real axis becomes red?
>
> No, of course not.
>
>> What colour has the real axis after you have solved both tasks?
>
> Depending on the order of the tasks. I think half red or half black.

Well you have to reference academic reference and describe "supertask"
besides "asymptotics" about where "the asymptotic density of black or
red respectively is 1 in the limit", that you point to "supertask"
instead of mumbling like it's not already considered by proper minds,
not just ketonic neck-flap gaspers of having failures altogether
of any sort of related-rates problems.

This is mathematics: humor is irrelevant, and so is what
anybody "thinks", or, "feels".

It only matters what "is", and there's a language of it,
so use it. (Or lose it.)

Good sir