| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<BjqdnU25wMan36P6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:10:33 +0000 Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers Newsgroups: sci.math References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vh76bi$3bnde$1@dont-email.me> <d90452a5-965b-443f-9146-96cdf9b3906c@att.net> <vh8ft0$3jqb5$3@dont-email.me> <vh8g5e$3juug$1@dont-email.me> <vh8otd$3lhlt$2@dont-email.me> <vhb1is$6hbv$2@dont-email.me> <vhb1mu$6hbv$4@dont-email.me> <vhb32t$7ese$1@dont-email.me> <vhch7n$hge9$2@dont-email.me> <vhcieh$jjk5$1@dont-email.me> <vhcjg5$hdd4$3@dont-email.me> <vhckkh$k32g$1@dont-email.me> <vhcp0r$hge9$6@dont-email.me> <vhd7d7$nt37$1@dont-email.me> <vhd9lq$obb0$1@dont-email.me> <883377b7ebbd9d5d528db048daf9f682e3854ae8@i2pn2.org> <vhdfu1$p3fg$2@dont-email.me> <vhdlgc$qod3$1@dont-email.me> <vhfrnd$1adlc$2@dont-email.me> <vhfsfu$1bgpj$1@dont-email.me> <vhfuta$1adlc$3@dont-email.me> <vhgd02$1ep1p$1@dont-email.me> <vhge3n$1eu67$1@dont-email.me> <vhgfec$1f6mn$1@dont-email.me> <vhi8c0$1sjsn$1@dont-email.me> <vhif1d$1u4gp$1@dont-email.me> <vhkj2p$25fe$1@dont-email.me> <vhkqs7$4jg8$1@dont-email.me> <vhl4lk$5q4u$1@dont-email.me> <vhlfel$8hr6$1@dont-email.me> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 12:10:36 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <vhlfel$8hr6$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <BjqdnU25wMan36P6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 46 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-Fu7QDWfroYwvLLzL4LYO0EZMKtGSY1g6dmq18+3PXrTbnqYdtpwSiWoIb0LyBfBv901a0c77x/yKc9Y!/gYO72ocE8dbMxQH5g8cmle/y1S3RVqc/HC+OROxqrJkWECktJBIUgsrlLGGw2/eMqqkn7BdKmjO!iQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3839 On 11/20/2024 12:05 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: > WM wrote on 11/20/2024 : >> On 20.11.2024 15:14, FromTheRafters wrote: >>> WM formulated on Wednesday : >> >>>> >>>> It does not make it wrong, but it unmasks it at imprecise. That's >>>> why I don't like it. We can do better. >>> >>> It works well enough. >> >> Really? Then you can answer the following questions: >> >> Let every unit interval after a natural number on the real axis be >> coloured white with exception of the powers of 2 which are coloured >> black. Is it possible to shift the black intervals so that the whole >> real axis becomes black? > > No, of course not. > >> Or: Let every unit interval after a natural number on the real axis be >> coloured as above with exception of the intervals after the odd prime >> numbers which are coloured red. Is it possible to shift the red >> intervals so that the whole real axis becomes red? > > No, of course not. > >> What colour has the real axis after you have solved both tasks? > > Depending on the order of the tasks. I think half red or half black. Well you have to reference academic reference and describe "supertask" besides "asymptotics" about where "the asymptotic density of black or red respectively is 1 in the limit", that you point to "supertask" instead of mumbling like it's not already considered by proper minds, not just ketonic neck-flap gaspers of having failures altogether of any sort of related-rates problems. This is mathematics: humor is irrelevant, and so is what anybody "thinks", or, "feels". It only matters what "is", and there's a language of it, so use it. (Or lose it.) Good sir