Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<BnWdnWj9ULmJ0Pb6nZ2dnZfqnPQAAAAA@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 00:08:52 +0000
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Newsgroups: sci.math
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vjss56$1tr00$2@dont-email.me>
 <357a8740434fb6f1b847130ac3afbd33c850fc37@i2pn2.org>
 <vjv6fb$2dujf$2@dont-email.me>
 <b0c7449413fec43bc18e8d2d67da1c779a350bc2@i2pn2.org>
 <vk1cad$2srst$1@dont-email.me>
 <ceaaf003457afd2e381c8f115a4e691611162ffe@i2pn2.org>
 <vk3g0l$3cjvc$3@dont-email.me> <vk3lv1$3e9se$1@dont-email.me>
 <vk3vh6$3g0a3$1@dont-email.me> <vk4jfi$3k04r$4@dont-email.me>
 <d4d38bb75acc471a684759922b8f8d32707855a8@i2pn2.org>
 <vk6uu7$4f7v$1@dont-email.me>
 <cdd51ad73c172f40f3212801d7afd9eef8e60d47@i2pn2.org>
 <vk936n$khia$1@dont-email.me>
 <787067e5de3c455cb57389315b6821e96bcf86af@i2pn2.org>
 <f713f771-6cdd-44bb-90ab-7300d739f84b@tha.de>
 <1b6f89e7c35e4c9674af5a480e4bab6cb72e0915@i2pn2.org>
 <vkbalq$14tg7$2@dont-email.me>
 <733ce219e9d2422859035e5094a7b3e92eea9c47@i2pn2.org>
 <vke3bi$1q36j$2@dont-email.me>
 <md-cnZfuwoBJMPf6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vkf5et$20tbj$1@dont-email.me>
 <BnWdnWn9ULkj0fb6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 16:09:02 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BnWdnWn9ULkj0fb6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <BnWdnWj9ULmJ0Pb6nZ2dnZfqnPQAAAAA@giganews.com>
Lines: 73
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-0DQUi5MUOI6WkQjIcajdRn9o+BS+i3kn//WDUmXCA3HbFKvV+ONX0PL/KqE0T/ELNn5CHI0z8SYfNTe!b1UGovAJjQAK4NhS51lbWsa1+/mzyaVgi+BuaJvbffiSY/XsCZ6qvD80HoVNrTrt0w5bi3H+JUJR
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4329

On 12/24/2024 04:07 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 12/24/2024 12:27 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 12/24/2024 4:48 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>> On 12/24/2024 02:45 AM, WM wrote:
>>>> On 23.12.2024 15:32, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 12/23/24 4:31 AM, WM wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, I do as Cantor did.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, you do what you THINK Cantor did,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Show an n that I do not use with all intervals [1, n].
>>>>
>>>>> The LAST one, which you say must exist to use your logic.
>>>>
>>>> I do what Cantor did. There is no last one. You cannot show an n that I
>>>> do not use. There is none. Therefore all your arguing breaks down.
>>>>
>>>> Regards, WM
>>>>
>>>
>>> Cantor went insane, ....
>>>
>>
>> Cantor Pairing works with any unsigned integer.
>
> No, it works with two copies of the all the integers,
> a left-hand-side and right-hand-side,
> with regards to pairs
> one from column A and one from column B.
>
> It reminds me of Prof. R., one time I
> told him "I'm studying infinity" and
> he laughed and said "infinity makes
> people nuts" and I laughed and said
> "yeah, it does".
>
> Point being that the incongruities of
> what so many times is merely lax book-keeping
> of "mathematical paradox" _seem_ to arise
> from infinity, when it's really that there
> are none, there are no mathematical paradoxes,
> that point is to arrive at a theory for
> mathematical objects, infinity and continuity
> and all, and especially continuity and infinity,
> that is sane.
>
>
> That lazy, forgetful mathematicians confuse and
> confound and conjoin and conflate various abstractions
> and generalizations that are not due, has that
> partial accounts are not sound.
>
> So, there's a complete account.
>
> "Cantor Pairing" isn't two integers,
> it's two copies of the all the integers.
>
> It's called a "subset of a Cartesian Product,
> including book-keeping which domain is which".
>
> Also it's usually called being Galilean,
> or having the same cardinal.
>
>
> Imagine a fountain of soap.
>
> A tower of rain, ....
>
>

Behind the noodles, ....