Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <BylxrtQ8uTAjH8xGa-w7HrizxuI@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <v7312o$m1pa$1@dont-email.me> <XwY8ULD6v2JS4ZHo_cHsUB4VbmM@jntp>
 <v7376c$mo0c$2@dont-email.me> <obKUvOe0ugnrZaE9lm7mmPDWGmc@jntp> <v73vsm$rk3i$1@dont-email.me>
 <1_yKjTpqmsQ9bfJRH4twqjmHrvw@jntp> <v75jn9$1828i$1@dont-email.me> <PhlaOM2P3vZR8IRhh5jXqkoP1tg@jntp>
 <v76kvc$1e2bb$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: jeaKCN7el-8Bt50PWZHEp30BmuE
JNTP-ThreadID: sxhQQgyUgiiv6OcO_6O_beeL7bk
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=BylxrtQ8uTAjH8xGa-w7HrizxuI@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 24 20:43:54 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-16T20:43:54Z/8951516"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
Bytes: 3096
Lines: 46

Le 16/07/2024 à 22:25, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
> I will however write this:
> 
> A proton is guided by RF-cavities and bending magnets around
> the circuit in the LHC.
> If the speed of the proton wasn't exactly right (slightly less than c)
> the RF-cavities wouldn't work because each cavity has to be in the right 
> phase when the proton passes it, and the bending magnets wouldn't guide 
> the proton around the bends because the deflection of the proton
> is strongly dependent on its speed.
> 
> I do indeed understand what you are saying.
> 
> You are saying that when the physicists drifting the LHC know
> that a proton has went around the circuit once, it has really
> went around the circuit 6933 times.
> 
> This is an incredible stupid claim, and it is hard to believe
> that a sane person can believe so.
> 
> Your "theory" isn't even wrong, it is only incoherent nonsense.
> 
> Enough now!

Mais il est complètement foi ce Paul... LOL !!!

<http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?BylxrtQ8uTAjH8xGa-w7HrizxuI@jntp/Data.Media:1>

J'ai dit que le proton tournait en réalité dans le système 6933 fois 
plus vite que ne le mesuraient les horloges placées dans le référentiel 
du laboratoire. 

 Il s'agit d'une simple dilatation des durées dans le référentiel du 
laboratoire. 

 Je n'ai jamais dit que quand il tournait une fois, il tournait 6933 fois. 


 Paul est devenu complètement fou.

 Que vas devenir ce forum?

 R.H.