Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <CBAARt4EEHThxO17L5beYQ9mMWI@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Who=3F=20?=
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: qyjLIPII7jatn5wppOAKapO1r_k
JNTP-ThreadID: QrZBnCtdo05l509rjTwRa5SEcck
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=CBAARt4EEHThxO17L5beYQ9mMWI@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 24 12:24:31 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-24T12:24:31Z/8998733"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>

If I put two watches of the same internal manufacture, that is to say two 
watches of the same chronotropy (chronotropy is the internal way of a 
watch to measure time), and I notice that one marks 3 o'clock, and the 
other three and a quarter, I conclude that they are not synchronized.
Synchronizing two watches means for Dr. Hachel (I don't know about 
others), that at a certain moment they mark the same time.
For example, I synchronize the watches at the start of the Langevin, and 
the two watches mark t=0.
At the end of the experiment, the two watches are desynchronized, they no 
longer mark the same time at the same instant for the observer.

Synchronizing means, matching the instants at a given moment, on watches 
of identical chronotropy at the start.

Saying "and making them beat at the same rhythm" is ridiculous. This is 
necessarily included in the reasoning.

It would not occur to anyone to experiment with a lousy watch that beats 
faster or slower than another.

Now, further (this is Hachel speaking, let's give way to the master of 
RR).
What happens if I set two identical watches (same chronotropy) on my table 
and I slowly move one of them towards the moon
(let's say in three weeks to avoid a v²/c² ratio very different from 1)?

I notice in my telescope that when my watch marks
00:00'08" the lunar clock is desynchronized and marks 00:00'07".

Is this true or not?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it's not true
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Python

If it's Python who protests, of course it's true.

The fundamental question, absolutely fundamental, absolutely dramatic, 
absolutely scientific and above all absolutely relativistic, is: WHY are 
watches out of sync?

There, two very clear opinions will oppose each other, that of the idiot 
Python, and that of the true genius of humanity Hachel.

This will inevitably create the most magnificent sparks in the entire 
history of relativity, and forty years of hatred, misunderstandings, 
bullshit, whining..

I'll ask my question again, of such depth that we must warn potential 
contenders for armed conflict with Hachel not to answer stupid things.

WHY are watches out of sync?

Because I love them, me, my two watches, and it hurts my heart to see them 
in this sad state.

Who can answer the best RR theorist in history (me) without answering 
beside the point, but totally beside the point?

Who has this formidable level (a moment of hope).

R.H.