Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 20:47:54 +0000
Subject: Re: The truth about the Lorentz Transformation.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <152fdece6d8ad07399662b8718f94e75@www.novabbs.com>
 <vcb6pi$3cfv6$1@dont-email.me>
 <7929553fdddeb12b78821749abdfc4b9@www.novabbs.com>
 <66eaa680$0$3233$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
 <8rydnR-bvfADqXb7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <xzKdnVNo1fqnpHb7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 13:47:56 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <xzKdnVNo1fqnpHb7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <CsidnTp4T47noXb7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 63
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-RPuBPVYuleSWs8pjK7oWL4/Wqi6W2+YztEPRG4xAGww340uwkgD2wTHQ2eRr9pQ1/ssqTlzHvqwOzLW!4bb81Ps/C3AgW9FBvUcQtTGhce++Nni+g15Vkl9EsJ0FE84qaiEY1U/JsVdU9jLJJianh6mp8jyl
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3464

On 09/18/2024 01:33 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 09/18/2024 01:14 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 09/18/2024 03:08 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mikko: In reality, it only applies to an ether. Otherwise, Galilean
>>>> transformations apply. You are mistaken, as shown in my first comment.
>>>> You have not replied to it. The big ego mathematicians here would reply
>>>> that it must be used at speeds near light speed. That is not true
>>>> without an ether.
>>>
>>> And it doesn't have anything to do with phlogiston either,
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Oh, how about a-diabatic, and, non-a-diabatic?
>>
>> Hey have you heard that JWST roundly paint-canned inflationary cosmology?
>>
>
> Anybody who introduces and adds to the theory
> "dark matter", why galaxies hold together, and
> "dark energy", why galaxies drift apart,
> instead of just noting that it falsifies the model,
> actually adding un-observables which are non-scientific,
> is guilty of having commited a stupid and the non-scientific.
>
>
> Articles the other day, "latest cyclotron results
> definitely say Higgs is on the red dot", and it's like,
>
> https://cms.cern/news/cms-fired-shot-heavy-higgs-particles-and-gun-smoking
>
> "Enter the Two Higgs Doublet Model (2HDM), ...".
>
>
> I.e., Higgs is on either side of the dot,
> yet not exactly spot-on, ....
>
>
> Then of course there's Little Higgs and
> real gravitons, and Supersymmetry is alive
> again three different ways.
>
> And what those news articles are just so much
> as of an asthma-inhaler or something, and it's
> like, "quit huffing the fumes".
>
>


It's like, "what's in the science fair this year",
and it's like, "Little Johhny demonstrated that
he could make a fire-starting kit by shorting
an alkaline or lithium battery, yet then he
started putting a fork in the socket and
the lights went out".

Then it was apparent that alkaline and lithium burn different.