Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<D-NHOH5uV_cOA8qap2rvlWyYptA@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <D-NHOH5uV_cOA8qap2rvlWyYptA@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <17ef4f5375487563$506650$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <6f245833fb3cc5f325c276e2d0ead734@www.novabbs.com> <17ef7e11220c8a88$512687$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <23cf024421e08236d5d9a53fe6ff1051@www.novabbs.com> <17ef9d6e3e1ef923$670188$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <Ibjh1AmAa9PjZiQF-UQX-2NHlQ0@jntp> <vakqra$2u8l5$13@dont-email.me> <_51wt7ikRc6yDpws76imaPG0on4@jntp> <vakrth$2u8l5$17@dont-email.me> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: FvUq9M8amak3JXHpGiTjTKsROyg JNTP-ThreadID: 17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=D-NHOH5uV_cOA8qap2rvlWyYptA@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Tue, 27 Aug 24 15:49:25 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-27T15:49:25Z/9002584"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> Bytes: 2628 Lines: 22 Le 27/08/2024 à 17:38, Python a écrit : > Le 27/08/2024 à 17:31, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : >> Le 27/08/2024 à 17:20, Python a écrit : >>> Le 27/08/2024 à 17:15, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : >>> ... >>>> Let's take the proper time of accelerated objects. I am sure of my >>>> move, because everything is of great theoretical coherence from >>>> beginning to end when I speak of RR. Physicists are not capable of >>>> it, but they will NEVER say it, they prefer to insult and try to >>>> discredit. >>> >>> A proof (several proofs as a matter of fact) that your claim violates >>> the principle of Relativity is in no way an insult. >>> >>> It is a discredit, maybe, but that's your fault. >> >> What proof? > > Putting your head in the sand won't help Richard. Ce n'est PAS une réponse. R.H.