Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <D-NHOH5uV_cOA8qap2rvlWyYptA@jntp>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<D-NHOH5uV_cOA8qap2rvlWyYptA@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <D-NHOH5uV_cOA8qap2rvlWyYptA@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <17ef4f5375487563$506650$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <6f245833fb3cc5f325c276e2d0ead734@www.novabbs.com>
 <17ef7e11220c8a88$512687$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <23cf024421e08236d5d9a53fe6ff1051@www.novabbs.com>
 <17ef9d6e3e1ef923$670188$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <Ibjh1AmAa9PjZiQF-UQX-2NHlQ0@jntp>
 <vakqra$2u8l5$13@dont-email.me> <_51wt7ikRc6yDpws76imaPG0on4@jntp> <vakrth$2u8l5$17@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: FvUq9M8amak3JXHpGiTjTKsROyg
JNTP-ThreadID: 17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=D-NHOH5uV_cOA8qap2rvlWyYptA@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 24 15:49:25 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-27T15:49:25Z/9002584"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 2628
Lines: 22

Le 27/08/2024 à 17:38, Python a écrit :
> Le 27/08/2024 à 17:31, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
>> Le 27/08/2024 à 17:20, Python a écrit :
>>> Le 27/08/2024 à 17:15, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
>>> ...
>>>> Let's take the proper time of accelerated objects. I am sure of my 
>>>> move, because everything is of great theoretical coherence from 
>>>> beginning to end when I speak of RR. Physicists are not capable of 
>>>> it, but they will NEVER say it, they prefer to insult and try to 
>>>> discredit.
>>>
>>> A proof (several proofs as a matter of fact) that your claim violates
>>> the principle of Relativity is in no way an insult.
>>>
>>> It is a discredit, maybe, but that's your fault.
>> 
>> What proof?
> 
> Putting your head in the sand won't help Richard.

 Ce n'est PAS une réponse.

 R.H.