| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<D69QMt7Sl70ByIgZ0qdtdfSA7FQ@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <D69QMt7Sl70ByIgZ0qdtdfSA7FQ@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Does the number of nines =?UTF-8?Q?increase=3F?= References: <tJf9P9dALSN4l2XH5vdqPbXSA7o@jntp> <59961718-bd36-46df-801a-4f977fcc05cf@att.net> <v5hnrl$29b21$3@dont-email.me> <a21eede6-2b9f-44f0-8732-32bd92700dfb@att.net> <eZZGYbe53s6yBDBqGuTMM_Z1y7A@jntp> <v5jm70$2o1ji$1@dont-email.me> <7IOaykTbfjXdA1AMOzAEFksmqwU@jntp> <v5kuka$1as01$1@i2pn2.org> <ZFlyaJ5FGPIRVx6UhPZ2H8N3onc@jntp> <v5nd52$3hovk$1@dont-email.me> Newsgroups: sci.math JNTP-HashClient: 1o5G2GtqF7338bvAr9VxadZ5i2M JNTP-ThreadID: 0JbXgoRqYUfKvvWhEBWZVJgnda4 JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=D69QMt7Sl70ByIgZ0qdtdfSA7FQ@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Sat, 29 Jun 24 17:01:10 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="25d5a506365fc8262443ce1bd287e5d0233c1bef"; logging-data="2024-06-29T17:01:10Z/8924493"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Bytes: 2231 Lines: 23 Le 29/06/2024 à 00:23, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : > On 6/28/2024 6:41 AM, WM wrote: >> Le 28/06/2024 à 02:03, Richard Damon a écrit : >> >>> As was saidd, Cardinatality of infinte sets work differently than that >>> of finite sets. >> >> Here is no cardinality asked for. >> >> A non-terminating digit sequence does not determine a real number. > > Huh? Sure it can. What is: > > .(428571) That is a formula determining an infinite digit sequence > > ? It is a non-terminating digit sequence in base ten. No. Like "0.111..." it is a formula. Formulas determine sequences. The other way round is not possible. Regards, WM