Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <EERzv3aP9TEoacG4AxMnTqq39UU@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: A Relativist Beginning a Reasonable Defense of Relativity
References: <03116e1c09f85b3c8e75694bd3e2942a@www.novabbs.com> <998d52cb7818306151f58d993544178b@www.novabbs.com>
 <KePRvlqpXmDxKlB61iUYg5xK6qo@jntp> <293f627460783ed108fa4f5bb5c2540e@www.novabbs.com> <nK7b9Z7KvzM_N9LlVWDoXQiLgT8@jntp>
 <34b156f552ca834a0657e5a30efe37c8@www.novabbs.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: upNFWTyNarHAotqPqmRoGLhFcVA
JNTP-ThreadID: 03116e1c09f85b3c8e75694bd3e2942a@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=EERzv3aP9TEoacG4AxMnTqq39UU@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 24 19:56:16 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-10-30T19:56:16Z/9081066"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid>
Bytes: 2465
Lines: 18

Le 30/10/2024 à 20:26, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit 
:
> Richard Hachel: The LT presumes an ether wind affects the light just as
> a current in a river affects a ship.  It is invalid without an ether.
> The LT is based on the ether and is pointless without it, just as it
> would be pointless to use it to calculate the time it takes for a boat
> to cross a pond without a current. You are necessarily presuming an
> ether wind exists to conclude there is anisochrony.

The ether wind is of no interest if we replace the ether with an 
anisochronous vacuum.
On the other hand, once this is done the equations are then explained very 
well.
Note that the ether implies an absolute space supported by "something": 
physically and experimentally, this is absurd and all the more absurd 
since we no longer need all this if we posit a simple universal 
anisochrony.

R.H.