Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<EKl3K4t_o-zL9DFltVxf6uukWKU@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!news.nntp4.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <EKl3K4t_o-zL9DFltVxf6uukWKU@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: The puzzle science is solving References: <18028c43ae3207f6$154608$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <29b2833796a5e458d9a73af6b0c42bed@www.novabbs.com> <oQr_EXdbPn0FCtPjv5NJ8GBqQtI@jntp> <1802a86653504235$206958$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <KZhMQORhgUvz_-5HcU9N2EfLhl4@jntp> <1802ae069b7f9ad9$232057$945036$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <a3X07_NwSUb1VZMr9_XWO3c_qPc@jntp> <1802ba1286812ff2$242600$958250$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: 4aBKMFR2bPSk4gLaJy5OPfkqM3U JNTP-ThreadID: 18028c43ae3207f6$154608$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=EKl3K4t_o-zL9DFltVxf6uukWKU@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Mon, 28 Oct 24 21:41:14 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="093ce991d431b4e97f56ba97ef7875a292faca35"; logging-data="2024-10-28T21:41:14Z/9078658"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Python <python@not-formail.invalid> Bytes: 5338 Lines: 105 Le 28/10/2024 à 22:09, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > W dniu 28.10.2024 o 21:05, Python pisze: >> Le 28/10/2024 à 18:29, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>> W dniu 28.10.2024 o 17:14, Python pisze: >>>> Le 28/10/2024 à 16:46, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>>>> W dniu 28.10.2024 o 15:07, Python pisze: >>>>>> Le 28/10/2024 à 13:05, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit : >>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 7:10:30 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is not "how things really are". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is "which word sequences are good ones". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I disagree. Humans build maps of reality. >>>>>>> They're called scientific theories. >>>>>> >>>>>> If "word sequences that are good ones" means that de-compiled forms >>>>>> of the programs we have in our brains i.e. logic, maths and physics >>>>>> (for instance) are matching the actual programs that are correct >>>>> >>>>> But there is no one-and-unique "correct". >>>>> There are just local optimums, and they're >>>>> floating (what is good now doesn't have to be >>>>> good in 100 years). >>>> >>>> We could agree on that. Rather than local optimums I would say that >>>> they are more complete "High level" implementations of the "machine >>>> language" in your brains. >>> >>> Bigger and more powerful software doesn't mean >>> "more complete". It's just bigger and more >>> powerful. >> >> Krivine (and his team) views are not about software per se. >> it is an analogy between programs in our brains (low level >> "programmed" by evolution) and logic/math/physics as "decompiled" by >> humans from their own introspection. > > > So, there is no reason to care about their views. > Introspection? Of - what? Apart of a human brain > nothing deals with words, neither mathematical > way nor any other way. > > >>> And so is our knowledge - compared >>> to the knowledge of our ancestors. There is >>> no "complete" state it's targetting. >> >> Sure. Krivine makes fun of physicists looking for the "theory >> of everything" or "the language of God". >> >>>>>> (because evolution made sur they do) >>>>> >>>>> In some centuries [SR] will be >>>>> only remembered as an antipattern of "how >>>>> and why you should never make a scientific >>>>> theory or any description of anything". >>>> >>>> Your mistake is to deny that SR, as well as NM, are fitting very well >>>> with this line of thinking. >>> >>> So is marxism-leninism. >> >> I do think so too. But I'm marxist :-) >> >>> At least - as long as >>> its enthusiasts are evaluating that. But none >>> of your idiot gurus had any real knowledge >>> about the process of putting words together. >> >> Then you're going to abuse and off-track idiotic rant, again. >> Preventing any kind of communication with others. > > > It's for sure nothing but some idiotic rant to > suggest that your bunch of idiots doesn't know > everythibg about everything. > For sure, suggesting there is something you don't > know - immediately prevents any kind of communication > with you. You didn't suggest that there is something I don't know. What the Hell are you talking about ? > That's how the DK effect works. > >> >> You seem to have decided at some point in your life that everyone >> on Earth were producing non-sense except you > > What you're projecting at me is exactly what The > Shit has taught yourself and your fellow idiots. So Humanity is a plot against Maciej Wozniak ? LOL!!! > But, no, the followers of The Shit are no way > "everyone except me". Oh ! Name a few that follows your views on SR (and the rest of Physics) ? Name one.