Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<EZ-dnezBtvVJQzD6nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: John Harshman <john.harshman@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Anserifornes existed 67 million years ago
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 17:30:19 +0530
Organization: University of Ediacara
Lines: 31
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <EZ-dnezBtvVJQzD6nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
References: <vo2mpq$3102o$1@dont-email.me>
 <F9WdnQr5mvlb_jH6nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <voi089$2a5p9$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="75457"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Return-Path: <poster@giganews.com>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id C0D7D22978C; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 07:00:59 -0500 (EST)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87FA3229783
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 07:00:57 -0500 (EST)
          by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.98)
          for talk-origins@moderators.isc.org with esmtp
          (envelope-from <poster@giganews.com>)
          id 1tiXtl-00000003aJi-25BN; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 13:00:53 +0100
	by egress-mx.phmgmt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4EE60A70
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 12:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
	by serv-1.ord.giganews.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECE0445BA2
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 06:00:20 -0600 (CST)
	by serv-1.i.ord.giganews.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id 51DC0K3s044473;
	Thu, 13 Feb 2025 06:00:20 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: serv-1.i.ord.giganews.com: news set sender to poster@giganews.com using -f
X-Path: news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
X-NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 12:00:19 +0000
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <voi089$2a5p9$1@dont-email.me>
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Original-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4122

On 2/12/25 4:51 PM, Ernest Major wrote:
> On 12/02/2025 09:03, John Harshman wrote:
>> On 2/6/25 8:08 AM, RonO wrote:
>>> https://www.science.org/content/article/ancestor-ducks-and-geese- 
>>> paddled-and-dove-alongside-dinosaurs-antarctica
>>>
>>> Some researchers claim to have found fossils of the ancestor or 
>>> extant ducks and geese dated to 67 million years ago in Antarctica.  
>>> The molecular evidence indicates that the lineage of birds existed 
>>> for more than 80 million years, but Anseriformes are supposed to have 
>>> branched off from Galliformes around 70 million years.  Neoaves is 
>>> supposed to have branched off 67 million years ago.  It looks like 
>>> the latests molecular dating isn't as exaggerated as previous estimates.
>>>
>>> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07323-1
>>>
>>
>> I think you may be a little confused about the dating. The supposed 
>> Antarctic Cretaceous anseriform would be Vegavis, and its identity has 
>> been strongly questioned. It might in fact be a stem-neornithine. In 
>> the study, the oldest fossil used to date Anseriformes was Conflicto, 
>> and that's Paleocene, while Presbyornis and others are younger.
>>
> 
> The science.org link reports a recent publication on a Vegavis skull, 
> which places Vegavis as a (stem?) anseriform.
> 
> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08390-0
> 
Various publications have put it in various places. However, it wasn't 
used in the cited study.