Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <EvuI3XyKZjggDbuGot9mEKvi08M@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <181a63878c3a598f$86738$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <jifh8z9kBXJpfBLJBNHCj0M6zfo@jntp> <181a8ab40daa2f3b$84542$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <8kbiEMBjBP64SDxCqmK9hPf8iW8@jntp> <181a97a8cae7837c$86741$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <NJuSuqDy0JPTakkJauWYlZVmOr8@jntp> <181a997dca85fca1$84543$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <fyLcmxRQ7IFokA-xggYiYIaufuw@jntp> <181a9d3f85e42e77$84544$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: Dzc1AN0eCPvkA4skuwrtu3G8heE
JNTP-ThreadID: 4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-Uri: http://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=EvuI3XyKZjggDbuGot9mEKvi08M@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 25 17:23:59 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="4c09a34f508d594250dfb72c3a5b34a202eec0ae"; logging-data="2025-01-14T17:23:59Z/9174692"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <jp@python.invalid>
Bytes: 3494
Lines: 48

Le 14/01/2025 à 17:51, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 14.01.2025 o 16:49, Python pisze:
>> Le 14/01/2025 à 16:42, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> ..
>>>> Again, how come you are incapable of convincing ANYONE neither here 
>>>> nor elsewhere that your rant is a proper proof of anything?
>>>
>>> Again - a fanatic idiot can never be convinced
>>> that he is a fanatic idiot, no surprise in
>>> that.
>> 
>> All of Humanity but Maciej Wozniak are "fanatic idiots"? You need > medical 
>> help, Maciej.
> 
> Al of humanity comes for  discussing on a
> physics newsgroup? You need medical help,
> Python.

Did you ever confront your "proofs" to anyone outside of here? If so 
where? To what people?

Did ever even ONCE a human being has considered any of your "proofs" as 
valid?

Did you ever asked yourself, given how short and simple are your "proofs", 
why NOBODY has proposed your arguments as "proofs" that SR was 
inconsitent?

>>> And as for rants - they are all yours. I've
>>> pointed directly 2 denying themself predictions of
>>> the physics of your idiot guru, i.e. provided
>>> a proof of its inconsistency.
>> 
>> Again, your alleged "proofs" have been refuted with meaningful 
>> arguments
> 
> Both refutation an meaningful arguments are,
> unfortunately, just some delusion of yours.
> Samely as being "all of humanity".

Did you ever consider that, maybe, maybe you are too stupid and/or too 
stubborn to seriously consider these arguments?

Have you heard about Andrew Wiles proof of Fermat theorem in the 90x? Do 
you have the expertise to evaluate the validity of this alleged proof? Do 
you think that this alleged proof is valid (considering that it has been 
reviewed and revised afterward)?