| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<F05YhSiLBMD82bTtRx6SKxQedBs@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <F05YhSiLBMD82bTtRx6SKxQedBs@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics References: <uvb7db$2bj35$1@tor.dont-email.me> <e7b18fbbd25aef1edf75d3fd7baa053a@www.novabbs.com> <1qso30i.hyqy7pf46wb5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <v0limi$12erm$1@dont-email.me> <1qsqfo1.13w3szaq4r4yrN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <v10etd$3ug4n$1@dont-email.me> <1qt3wjx.10jhis6vgdkcpN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: qCGJ8K0JEhG0E7YdK96Py4DW4hI JNTP-ThreadID: uvb7db$2bj35$1@tor.dont-email.me JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=F05YhSiLBMD82bTtRx6SKxQedBs@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Tue, 07 May 24 07:00:36 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/121.0.0.0 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="601f4a4a60dc6043f0c3ab83656fd85fb6bc327d"; logging-data="2024-05-07T07:00:36Z/8847002"; posting-account="219@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> Bytes: 4432 Lines: 76 Le 06/05/2024 à 07:18, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) a écrit : > Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> On 5/2/2024 3:51 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote: >> > Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >> On 4/27/2024 5:50 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote: >> >>> bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force >> >>>> does NOT have an equal and opposite reaction. Your point is merely >> >>>> theoretical. >> >>>> My evidence is experimental. >> >>> >> >>> Correct, merely experimental. >> >>> It stands falsified by a reliable theory. >> >>> >> >>> FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand >> >>> do conserve energy-momentum. >> >>> If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you >> >>> to tell the world what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz, >> >>> and how these equations must be modified. >> >>> >> >>> As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer, >> >>> >> >> >> >> It is entirely possible that Banjo stumbled across that apparent >> >> violation of momentum by momentum being carried away by the >> >> electromagnetic field. >> > >> > If the momentum is carried away by the electromagnetic fiel >> > there is still momentum conservation. >> >> Exactly. I just allowed for the extremely remote possibility he detected >> something relevant. Almost certainly, if he found anything he found the >> known momentum conserving electric field. >> >> > And photon drive really isn't a new idea. >> >> Even solar sails use that effect (momentum of sunlight). > > Radiation pressure must be taken into account > when calculating corrections to satellite orbits. > > And it costs real dollars, in fuel expended for station keeping > for geostationary sats, so it is really real. > And it was also found to be the cause of the Pioneer anomaly. > >> > However, it suffers from the unpleasant fact >> > that c = 300 megawatt/newton, in slightly unconventional units. >> >> That is why what we are really seeing is sloppy demonstrations, it is >> very unlikely Aridam's experiments could detect that small effect. We >> won't know because Aridam's experiments are unreproduceable, >> insufficient detail to reproduce his situation. > > Arindam's errors in his original demonstrations > of momentum non-conservation are trivial. The inertia violations are obvious. There are no errors. That experiments upsets dearly held theories, reducing them to wrong conjectures. Science gets the same sort of boost as with the discovery of electricity, air pressure, radioactivity... > A bright high school kid can spot them. So far none has. You may try. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee > > Jan