| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<Faydnfs1ifwyw5H6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 23:58:39 +0000
From: ant@zimage.comANT (Ant)
Subject: Re: SNL (Re: Free Castle Break on Steam!)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
References: <u0udnUv0vM3AjJr6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <sgekgjl4g4d0a2220k7gbfoasktckl0f3e@4ax.com> <nOCcneUrNIvcUpf6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> <6cvngjdpp63c5am0e90kjma3t4ktjs5vnh@4ax.com> <vehaqd$qb38$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20221225 ("Pittyvaich") (Linux/6.10.7-100.fc39.x86_64 (x86_64))
Message-ID: <Faydnfs1ifwyw5H6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 23:58:39 +0000
Lines: 40
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.180.143.226
X-Trace: sv3-wVOjG1I6ttzIa0ltvkrWmKhS5SLclPCBLfaHrL7+r5rluNJHauTfG2BwPWXmLP94WtVrO5rNmfwBSSk!qGdjRVr5NnISc4JwzeclXP9L+iVY1Yue4yLlyVifj3VYMyHY3uTfqQGlu0+5dxmpviLMhWbqcVbP!F2E3fZkpbTBbQXpZs1STkQO4p4b+9Iw5
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3514
Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote:
> >TL;DR: in twenty years, we (either personally or as a culture) be
> >looking back fondly on a lot of the current SNL skits and wondering
> >why the 2050 cast is so unfunny ;-)
> I remember first watching Saturday Night Live a few years after it
> first aired and already people were telling me that original cast was
> much better. I beleived them too, since most of the original cast
> where big name stars with movie careers by then. How could nobodies
> like Eddie Murphy and Joe Piscopo compare with the likes of Dan Aykroyd
> or Chevy Chase?
> As I continued to watch and enjoy it, I kept hearing how previous seasons
> and casts were better and how far downhill it had gone. Except now they
> were talking about seasons and casts I had seen myself. While I could
> agree such-and-such a sketch was a classic and so-and-so who left the
> show was really funny, I was still enjoying the show.
> By the time the 90's rolled around I realized people were just going
> to continue saying the show had gone downhill and whatever season and
> cast they first watched was the best. No one really had a viewpoint
> where they could objectively compare the seasons. Even me who never
> thought the show was bad couldn't really see where the show had it's
> inevitiable up and downs. Just too hard to objectively compare a show
> you're watching today to a show you saw years ago.
> When I heard people making similar complaints about The Simpsons I just
> ignored them. Somehow both perputually downhill shows have managed to
> survive even now when TV itself is in decline.
Like gaming. Older computer action games were better. /s ;)
--
"No temptation has seized you except what is common to man. And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear. But when you are tempted, he will also provide a way out so that you can stand up under it." --1 Corinthians 10:13. Trojans failed again. Go Doyers!
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org.
/ /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.
| |o o| |
\ _ /
( )