Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <FxxcAtB-BaU4TzfE-6Txlbo_gEA@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Space-time interval (2)
References: <YqTjbAPdSf8P-veYFHQCI8eskLU@jntp> <jBxUcP6BzIhx3lL1WyQctHmm7jo@jntp> <v9g6ij$3vsfg$1@dont-email.me>
 <AVa827R_LOez7mc5Ad3CT6GyhiA@jntp> <327c4ebc77dc16239ac38f00b508451b@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eb7db913381cc9$330199$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <ZmtVAt4HhKe0jdT-a3px1duKdmw@jntp>
 <v9i8c5$bvnu$9@dont-email.me> <VOohu46_lYfs6YEQG8qZQKYepNw@jntp> <v9ia7k$bvnu$11@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: om3_j9P4bmVnegt4lz3E3a3PBK8
JNTP-ThreadID: L0IgA2CWtv7gPeDAAk57TJ-BbeQ
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=FxxcAtB-BaU4TzfE-6Txlbo_gEA@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 24 13:24:17 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-14T13:24:17Z/8986542"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From:  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr>
Bytes: 3285
Lines: 34

Le 14/08/2024 à 15:08, Python a écrit :
> 
> Clocks are physical devices (except in Wozniak's mind). They are not
> synchronized by imaginary devices on imaginary spatial dimensions.
> 
> They are built in order to have the same rate (inside an acceptable
> narrow interval) to begin with, then drifted according to what
> General Relativity predict in order to stay in synch in ECI
> frame (despite what demented Wozniak pretends).
> 
> These are engineering tasks, not the stupid mythomaniac fantasies of
> a histrionic senile country doctor.

But you're mixing everything up.

That's not what I'm talking about, I'm talking about the initial 
synchronization. At some point you have to synchronize all the watches in 
all the capitals with each other.
However, this is by nature impossible.
The notion of universal anisochrony means that each watch will lag behind 
the other with an anisochrony Et=x/c, a reciprocal phenomenon that will 
affect all the watches in the universe.
So, to start the watches at t=0, you'll need a point in the universe 
placed at an equal distance from all the others, and only an abstract 
point placed in an imaginary, perpendicular dimension, at an equal 
distance from all the points in the local universe will be able to do 
this.
It's not hard to understand.
Now you are talking about something else, that is to say the second 
particularity which is no longer anisochrony, but the relativity of the 
internal chronotropy of watches, in the sense that time passes less 
quickly at the level of the satellite than at the level of a terrestrial 
clock, and that the chronotropic shift must be regularly reestablished.

R.H.