| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<G5mdnXqNwMsTeMr6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 06:54:06 +0000 Subject: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc References: <o4ucnYo2YLqmZ876nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vj1m3f$33eu5$16@dont-email.me> <947j2lx3qf.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <lrolhlFkmd2U1@mid.individual.net> <vj77pi$f8rj$9@dont-email.me> <24ffec92-9486-251d-7a42-d376b88b2c9b@example.net> <20241209135847.00004fb7@gmail.com> <lrpjjpFpep6U1@mid.individual.net> From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> Organization: wokiesux Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 01:54:05 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <lrpjjpFpep6U1@mid.individual.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <G5mdnXqNwMsTeMr6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> Lines: 18 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97 X-Trace: sv3-T98Ac6+uAK73LoQI1ubXA3V/vxT5HSZabAmxZygcYsHDWNSs3b7BjmKUCMGKfHi7bVEFJ6ocA8voh/6!VAAcWmwZrZzrZ5llHEHIOsiop91d9KIY8H6HYL3+1ZU8mhDwgQXeYjZp05l8Zy/9iEYX5sBnsk4t!T3UCKDC20s3WWH1Z+1Yb X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2129 On 12/9/24 8:25 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 13:58:47 -0800, John Ames wrote: > >> Any chance of this conversation returning to anything even *slightly* >> more relevant to *nix, computers in general, or, like, *anything* else? >> Maybe I should dig up some old Francis E. Dec rant for a more coherent/ >> relevant refresher course... > > Feel free to start a thread. Ummmmm ... I just TRIED with the "Bit-Slice" topic. Jumped IMMEDIATELY back to 'non-OS/Computer stuff' :-) Was HOPING for discussion/insight into 'alternative' schemes for 'CPU's and such derived from older solutions. Houston, we have a problem .............