| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<GBKdnR8BRps_BW_6nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 15:07:14 +0000 Subject: Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy References: <cjp3ujt8q0273ljkeu7tbe647333lctnqq@4ax.com> <vrsueg$1u3ji$3@dont-email.me> <mj04ujldfmcth908kn938cicg8a5g895f8@4ax.com> <vrt00g$1u3up$9@dont-email.me> <0a34uj9pf5r7f4kneahsc4v6qgfq1684mi@4ax.com> <vrt57k$1u3ji$12@dont-email.me> <7j64uj172e6b9tat3v1n7gla57mml2ag0j@4ax.com> <vrt75c$1u3up$13@dont-email.me> <k3n0vj9gjq062flnc42d7mi3ahsthu2gfv@4ax.com> <vsprgq$mdap$1@dont-email.me> <b1t0vj53njfgitf5ntdl8ssvv4e40vlli9@4ax.com> <xxxxxx-2B97EF.20420505042025@news.supernews.com> <p0q4vjhklek57l8jbkcaq530qkt0m8toct@4ax.com> From: % <pursent100@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 08:07:19 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <p0q4vjhklek57l8jbkcaq530qkt0m8toct@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 250406-2, 2025-4-6), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Message-ID: <GBKdnR8BRps_BW_6nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com> Lines: 71 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-aQCLNO/+FDkVFaHuLBmqcXrPUVtOJ0B9uRZ9B6Gccsw1L/BAaWqrFfcCXjKuXORk8L9K8Txi1pa1RzB!s4izGJYrfBpO/LEP7uWcuKFAgf+dQVVpD3Vix0dxGws8lwJa8L37uiLhl2hhulGex9c4VftOsUBH X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4432 Joel wrote: > Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> wrote: >> In article <b1t0vj53njfgitf5ntdl8ssvv4e40vlli9@4ax.com>, >> Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/bNZVr8U.png >>>>>> >>>>>> You've just shown that you DO NOT need 32GB of RAM... >>>>>> >>>>>> (and that Linux isn't smart enough to count RAM in base-2). >>>>> >>>>> https://i.imgur.com/4jItMI0.png >>>>> >>>>> As you can see, today, I have puked out a little into swap. >>>> >>>> Dude: give it up. >>>> >>>> You've got 33.5 decimal gigabytes of RAM. >>>> >>>> 19.2GB is in use with the other 14.3GB used for cache. >>>> >>>> And 3.7MB... >>>> >>>> ...one HUNDREDTH of one percent of it... >>>> >>>> ...is swapped out... >>>> >>>> ...and you think that's a solid argument? >>>> >>>> Linux has 14.3GB used for caching and for some reason chooses to swap a >>>> tiny, TINY fraction of data rather than use a little less for cache... >>>> >>>> ...and you think you're proving something good? >>> >>> So let me get this straight, your argument is that cache isn't >>> actually needed? >> >> Correct. Cache is not actually NEEDED. >> >> Yes, it is VERY nice to have spare RAM to use as system cache. But if >> you were really using all of your RAM for applications, there would be >> very little cache. Or maybe even no cache at all. >> >> Cache is the first thing to go when YOU need more RAM, for whatever >> reason. When you finish editing your 3 hour, 4K movie there will again >> be free RAM and various things will be cached again. >> >> If you had 48GB of RAM, you will initially have an even bigger system >> cache. Unused RAM is wasted RAM, so the system will cache everything >> it can. >> >> That is, until YOU need it for whatever. >> >> For example. This 32GB Mac currently has 15GB used and 17GB in cache. >> No swap at all. I started up VMware to run Windows, which has 10GB >> assigned to Windows. As expected, I now have 25GB used and 7GB in >> cache. Still no swap used at all. >> >> That is exactly how RAM/cache/swap is supposed to work. Cache >> everything possible, but release it when it is needed by the user. >> >> So, the fact that you are using 19GB and have 14GB in cache means YOU >> are not "using all the RAM". The system IS using all the RAM, and that >> is a good thing. But YOU have 14GB of RAM that YOU are not using. > > > Clearly, though, what I have makes my system more responsive, well > worth the meager investment in the RAM. > and what will you do with this great creation