Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<GdmgdQ7A6Qp7r4f912_TcUKNB0U@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.tomockey.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <GdmgdQ7A6Qp7r4f912_TcUKNB0U@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?Q?i=C2=B2=3D-=31?=
References: <Mhl_dvPLsa5T3I0u7LlBV0DezeM@jntp> <vor26h$2k3r$1@news.muc.de> <UZnRNmJ1Kajq7hfZaPJ_iwayJY8@jntp>
 <voselu$279j$1@news.muc.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: 0YrXr0QDlMMQSekvC_f_d7gsxgw
JNTP-ThreadID: dleoLw2b3FOzvFyB7ktIZAFnIAQ
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=GdmgdQ7A6Qp7r4f912_TcUKNB0U@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 25 14:46:46 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="c9a4bd318d1d3f8c1159515c137e90a82ffa5c02"; logging-data="2025-02-16T14:46:46Z/9211023"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 3192
Lines: 73

Le 16/02/2025 à 11:29, Alan Mackenzie a écrit :

>> MOI, j'explique. Le monde des imaginaires est tel que i^x=-1 quelque soit 
>> x.
> 
> OK, let's assume that for the purposes of argument.
>   i^2 = -1, and i^3 = -1.

 Yes.

 And also, i^(1/2), i^5, i^0, i^-5, i^(-5/3), etc...etc...etc...

 Always, i^x=-1.

 In mirror effect, we have the same thing in the reals with 1. The unit 1 
remains invariably 1 whatever the exponent we attribute to it. It is 
invariable. 1^x=1.

> Then

 Then what? 

>   (i^3 / i^2) = i, 

 Yes.

> and 
>   (i^3 / i^2) = (-1 / -1) = 1.

 No.

 i^3/i^2=i

 i=-1 
 

> So i = 1.

 Absolutely not. 

> But this contradicts i^2 = -1.

 No.

> So your "system" is self contradictory.

 Absolutely not.

 You are making a conceptual error. You are multiplying imaginaries with 
the laws of real numbers.
In real numbers 1*1=1.
In imaginary numbers i*i=i

It is quite counter-intuitive, I admit, but it is the truth of things, and 
sometimes you have to know how to question your preconceptions.
Let's take the example of the very young driver, who must learn to use the 
rearview mirror. He is initially surprised that the rear of the vehicle 
turns to the right when he turns the steering wheel to the right. We have 
the same thing with the first outing in a boat. The preconception is that 
you have to force the right oar to turn right, but it is the opposite. The 
rower must force the left oar.

However, handling complex numbers is very simple if we get rid of a 
ridiculous preconception that we use an imaginary mirror numbering while 
using real mathematics.

Tableau d'Hachel

<http://nemoweb.net/jntp?GdmgdQ7A6Qp7r4f912_TcUKNB0U@jntp/Data.Media:1>

 R.H. 

-- 
<https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=GdmgdQ7A6Qp7r4f912_TcUKNB0U@jntp>