| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<GgK3A7Su1qNY5W8IcGOxH65b-Fo@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <GgK3A7Su1qNY5W8IcGOxH65b-Fo@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven References: <18b19a246c596130bb840e5200b0ab57@www.novabbs.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: BXUctErsAhtJWPlZlNyNax-UoAY JNTP-ThreadID: 18b19a246c596130bb840e5200b0ab57@www.novabbs.com JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=GgK3A7Su1qNY5W8IcGOxH65b-Fo@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Thu, 19 Jun 25 18:01:55 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/137.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="0622b338f00df6c7e122ad5f6ee90645acf995aa"; logging-data="2025-06-19T18:01:55Z/9351097"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <rh@tiscali.fr> Le 15/06/2025 à 18:19, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit : > Mass does not change with variations of gravity. > Inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass. > Therefore, mass does not change with velocity. Mass is a relativistic invariant. Dr. Richard Hachel said: "One hippopotamus does not become two hippopotamuses by changing the frame of reference." If mass were a relativistic variant, the energy of a body would become E=2mc².sqrt(1+Vr²/c²). Everyone knows this is false, and that E=mc².sqrt(1+Vr²/c²). So, no. Mass is an invariant. It's strange, moreover, that idiotic scientists still write: m'=m/sqrt(1-v²/c²). This is ridiculous and false. It is energy that is relative to velocity, not mass. R.H.