Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<GgOdnRiQkYyT3ef7nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:57:01 +0000
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:57:01 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity
 fails.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <693b1f71c994c268d60983eb81fc6aaa@www.novabbs.com>
 <rQzdO.250256$RcM6.3626@fx13.ams4>
 <17db55a7e5709ab7$1933$480477$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <9283a49bcc091b1f621ebd566d650a38@www.novabbs.com>
 <fridnXzRMeebPOr7nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <6677e170$0$11724$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net>
In-Reply-To: <6677e170$0$11724$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <GgOdnRiQkYyT3ef7nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 36
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-h8p7IlkfoK82nhYXUctkUVVlbTbX4RcgI082yRE56hMNKPmikoZ7wGHTroBBq4AX2qoAF8YbgG/Odu/!3NlnAkoROZyG2s5K88uXN6bf015aCmbIAnip3M5FcGMrkqpCBy6PiJKw7jF+2s29SzIr3N0O8A==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2967

On 6/23/24 3:48 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 6/22/24 9:54 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>> Paul Anderson, thanks for the pdf. Your formula employs the
>>> electromagnetic assumption that gravity moves at the speed of light.
>>
>> You got this backwards. In GR, changes in gravity propagate at the local
>> symmetry speed, given by SPECIAL Relativity. It "just so happens" [#]
>> that electromagnetic waves travel at this same speed in vacuum. It is
>> merely an historical anomaly that it is called "the speed of light", due
>> to the round-about way Einstein first described relativity in 1905 --
>> the spacetime symmetry is MUCH more fundamental and important.
>>
>>    [#] This is neither happenstance nor accident....
>>
>> BTW modern derivations of SR don't use electromagnetism at all.
>>
>>> Your formula (1) has c^2 and it is clearly not 1^2, and is in m/s,
>>> contrary to Lodder.
>>
>> Nope. YOU have imposed specific units onto the formula/equation. The
>> equation itself does not impose any particular units on its variables
>> and constants [@], it merely requires that they be self-consistent.
>>
>>    [@] There are many systems of units in common use. You
>>    seem to think there is only one.
> 
> A forteriori, any result that depends on any particular choice
> of units (or dimensions) is unphysical.

Yes, of course. Good point. Similarly, any result that depends on choice 
of coordinates is unphysical.

Tom Roberts