Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <H95fWb48eQ3TZ3xuuWPjR0vauWM@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Relativistic synchronisation method
References: <4-GlI_h7vkz4Ndsd_KixgDLS7Gg@jntp> <lsati1FireqU1@mid.individual.net> <kQ0LSPYPi-eXWvUX1l430FGQz6g@jntp>
 <lscd99FrdlmU1@mid.individual.net> <nbIKxzcTXKviqKHe3MOYkBQMjII@jntp> <1WtCff6_rqltbeqcBsoo9BvDMqg@jntp>
 <6U3NAOIgT2D2_6uy86xLkb7mEgk@jntp> <pSBDN09gUYiBuRXuhy7L_GCs1Bk@jntp> <YKWwOGme4kISW0uD1yjYsJzsyRs@jntp>
 <lkSMn-X3lP4druvKe833qXB30Yo@jntp>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: VUpMdOfaQGDoDJR9iyax_u_mBuI
JNTP-ThreadID: YYnLTqUhhEGH779uk7wevDN2vH4
JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 190@nemoweb.net
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=H95fWb48eQ3TZ3xuuWPjR0vauWM@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 24 18:14:30 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-12-17T18:14:30Z/9145156"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid>
Bytes: 2979
Lines: 41

Le 17/12/2024 à 18:57, Python a écrit :
>> This is necessarily true
> 
> So why don't you stop suggesting otherwise by claiming that it is not said for 
> who "A marks tA/t'A" or "B marks tB"?
> 
> Are you playing being an idiot or are really an idiot? (I know the answer).

But that's not true, damn it...

He still hasn't understood.

I'M TALKING ABOUT THE OTHER watch.

If when my watch says NOON when I hit that tree on the side of the road, 
it's obvious that all observers in the universe will understand that MY 
watch says noon at that moment of impact.

MY watch.

Breathe, blow, I'll say it again: "MY watch says noon".

It's not hard to understand, it's at kindergarten level, and even little 
Stephanie, who is six years old and in CP,
she understands it.

That's one thing.

But now the tremendous slap in the face will come quickly, and we go from 
CP (6 years old) to Bac+15.

On other watches, even perfectly tuned according to the Eisntein 
procedure, which is a type M procedure (described by Hachel), it is NOT 
noon.

In their own hyperplane of simultaneity, they consider that at this 
present moment for them, MY watch is indeed marking noon, but NOT theirs.

Okay, are you starting to see the concept of universal anisochrony by 
positional change?

R.H.