Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <HY4_M296PCimxD1cmAaJLndYXXA@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <6782d853$0$28064$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <c2fdc44dd6b77812b78bd871c9bde8f3@www.novabbs.com> <4404fd8d88a2eacd658d92efeef4d6c2@www.novabbs.com>
 <UjtKffdj34rh4B-JrKumzbeGtnc@jntp> <Z5JtI3c-5JMvtNLf7dMsy-PULgc@jntp> <qLtiG5g8NZm1g-FnNGAZjmL-3pA@jntp>
 <PFhIpzW_CY6k7-NpFFWxQ6U3-eM@jntp> <GWVnRHejRmzcWpGcF8X1yi0s9Ok@jntp> <fj05Ngld3XDSXUprjPuMp0ivoP4@jntp>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: YB96_QBBgCXwd-_d-qyL-Zj1TN4
JNTP-ThreadID: 4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 190@nemoweb.net
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=HY4_M296PCimxD1cmAaJLndYXXA@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 25 20:34:36 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2025-01-13T20:34:36Z/9173833"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid>
Bytes: 3670
Lines: 50

Le 13/01/2025 à 21:04, Python a écrit :
> Le 13/01/2025 à 20:55, Richard Hachel  a écrit :

> And a bunch of Usenet posts, for your more recent claims on accelerated 
> travelers.

That's very kind of you.
It's quite rare to see you so kind, did you put honey in your Cognac?

Oh no, you're drinking Rum.
It would please the Gods if a man glorified his enemy by admitting that at 
least he doesn't cheat, and that what he says, he says of his own accord.

It remains to be demonstrated that everything I say is true.

So be it.

Now, you add: "I have already demonstrated to you, on numerous occasions, 
that there were errors in everything you say, notably in the proper times 
of accelerated objects, in the equality of certain proper times, in your 
apparent speeds, etc...etc...etc...."

Except that an improper term has been inserted in your sentence. You use 
the word "err". You say: "I have already demonstrated to you, on numerous 
occasions, that there were errors in..."

You are making a confusion (voluntary or involuntary) with the term 
"difference from what is taught".

I have often noticed that many people told me that I made mistakes, except 
that they called "theoretical discrepancies" errors.

These are not errors in the proper sense, neither mathematical (2+2=4 for 
everyone), nor theoretical (it is simply that the geometry used by Hachel 
is infinitely less grotesque than that of Minkowski, but that a follower 
of Minkowski reading Hachel will go crazy, and believe that it is Hachel 
who makes "errors".

These are not errors, it is simply a geometry that is more beautiful, more 
logical, less imprisoned in the straitjacket of the abstract and 
ridiculous Minkowskian block.

A true theory is a beautiful theory.

If a theory is not beautiful, it is because it is not true.

Je le répète, tu confonds "théorie fausse" et "théorie dissidente". 

R.H.