Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:13:27 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Cruz Destroys Gender Activist Judge During Hearing
References: <_qidnWbvU5joYdL7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v3uvof$22ru0$1@dont-email.me> <akSdnTp7Xod4lPj7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v46nj2$dg7s$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS
Message-ID: <HcKdnbj3yKOqqfr7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:13:27 +0000
Lines: 234
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-Xd3FfEEteFszp8cjVygimNq00SWwy4DR2ImEYNKiuFW5iW4asiA6LEUk1fRjEYYjfk7t36KmGOE5vOL!oHnSE9mGUjvBQWLE74Lg5wl930ua2EL7hgmRbzXlFuh+kbioYm/A6Q+HmcRQy2Rrpri6NqQWI4Kl
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 12151
X-Original-Lines: 208

On Jun 10, 2024 at 4:21:06 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6/8/24 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>  On Jun 7, 2024 at 5:51:24 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  
>>>  On 6/4/24 5:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>    On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:25:10 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>    
>>>>>    On 6/3/24 10:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>      In article <v3llcv$3kpo$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>      wrote:
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>      On 6/3/24 2:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>      In article <v3kipd$3u0gd$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>      wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>      On 6/2/24 10:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>      FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>      On 6/2/24 3:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>>>      So when you said you don't talk about another state's governor because
>>>>>>>>>>>>      he doesn't affect your life... that was... wait for it... a lie.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      How does eating out affect my life?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>      Now, trying to destroy capitalism and education in the country is
>>>>>>>>>>>      another matter.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>      Your own words: another state's governor doesn't affect my life.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>      Weird how you're now claiming some governors have the power to
>>>>>>>>>> do exactly
>>>>>>>>>>      that by "destroying capitalism and education" throughout the entire
>>>>>>>>>>      country by signing laws that only apply to their respective states. How
>>>>>>>>>>      does DeSantis signing an education bill that only applies to Florida
>>>>>>>>>>      affect your life, Effa?
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>      Still no answer here.
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>      But for some reason when Newsom signs laws, according to Effa the Hutt,
>>>>>>>>>>      he only has the power to affect California, despite the fact
>>>>>>>>>> that in many
>>>>>>>>>>      cases, he actually does affect the whole country with his bullshit. Like
>>>>>>>>>>      when he banned all gas-powered vehicles by 2035. That affects the whole
>>>>>>>>>>      country because California is such a large percentage of the car market,
>>>>>>>>>>      vehicle manufacturers conform their products to California standards
>>>>>>>>>>      regardless of where they'll eventually be sold.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>      Newsom went out to eat.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>      Newsom did exactly what Cruz did that gets your panties in a twist: he
>>>>>>>>      went on vacation while his state was in crisis. And he did it twice.
>>>>>>>>      Cruz only did it once.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>      DeSantis is destroying a state.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>      Not your state. Doesn't affect your life. Your words.
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>      Nope. False equivalence.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>      Newsom owned up to it.
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>      Newsom never 'owned up' to fleeing the state for vacation. Once he got
>>>>>>      caught, he admitted his maskless indoor dining at the French Laundry was
>>>>>>      wrong. But he never gave a mea culpa for being on vacation in Cabo while
>>>>>>      he his state was on fire.
>>>>>>      
>>>>>    You guys caused the fires, ignoring climate change.
>>>>    
>>>>    To quote our newest Hutt: Nope.
>>>>    
>>>>    This nonsense that the California wildfires are due to 'climate change' is
>>>>    ridiculous. Even Emperor Newsom has admitted that historically bad forest
>>>>    management at both the federal and state level is a major factor in the
>>>>    severity and frequency of the most recent wildfires.
>>>>    
>>>>    Anyone who thinks that if we'd all just installed more solar panels and
>>>> rode
>>>>    our bikes to work, that the state wouldn't be on fire every year is
>>>>  completely
>>>>    delusional. And these idiotic media reporters and politicians who keep
>>>>  saying
>>>>    that the amount of acreage burned in California in 2019-- the worst fire
>>>>  year
>>>>    (2.2 million acres)-- is 'record-breaking' and 'unprecedented' are
>>>>  bald-faced
>>>>    liars. It's fucking factually completely untrue.
>>>>    
>>>>    Before the 1800s, California would see anywhere from 5 to 14 million acres
>>>>    burn EVERY YEAR. That's 12% of the state burning every year. Before there
>>>>  were
>>>>    any SUVs or 'climate change'. Just as there were massive droughts in
>>>>    California long before the era of 'climate change'. California had a
>>>>  500-year
>>>>    drought between 800 and 1300 AD. These are documented scientific facts,
>>>> but
>>>>    that undermines the Agenda, so we get flat-out lies from politicians
>>>>  claiming
>>>>    this is unprecedented, which goes completely unchallenged by their media
>>>>    lackeys.
>>>>    
>>>>    Excess timber comes out of a forest in only one of two ways. It's either
>>>>    carried out or it burns up. We used to carry it out. It was called
>>>> logging.
>>>>  We
>>>>    had healthy forests and a thriving timber economy. Then in the 70s, we
>>>> began
>>>>    imposing a shit-ton of environmental laws-- both at the state and federal
>>>>    level-- that have made it all but impossible and wildly unprofitable to
>>>>  carry
>>>>    out that timber and what we've seen over those decades is increasingly
>>>>  severe
>>>>    forest fires.
>>>>    
>>>>    We've had an 80% decline in timber harvested out of California forests
>>>> since
>>>>    1980 and we've had 85% increase in acres destroyed by fire over that same
>>>>    period. The mismanagement has gotten to the point where you can tell the
>>>>    boundary between private forestland that is not affected by these laws and
>>>>  the
>>>>    public lands that are. The burn scars follow the property lines almost
>>>>  exactly
>>>>    in many cases.
>>>>    
>>>>    Wow, the climate sure is clever to only change over the public lands and
>>>>  burn
>>>>    them while leaving the private lands alone, isn't it?
>>>>    
>>>>    An untended forest will grow and grow until it chokes itself off. When
>>>> there
>>>>    are too many trees for the land to support, they start dying off, and that
>>>>    dead timber becomes thousands of square miles of fuel, just waiting to be
>>>>  set
>>>>    ablaze. California currently has four times the timber density that the
>>>> land
>>>>    can support. Even the reliably leftist L.A. Times, which never misses an
>>>>    opportunity to blame something bad on 'climate change', noted that
>>>> there are
>>>>    currently more than 150 million dead trees in the Sierra Nevada, just
>>>>  waiting
>>>>    to be ignited. That's how nature manages a forest and if we don't want
>>>> half
>>>>    the state on fire, we have to do something other than nature's way.
>>>>    
>>>>    That's why we started the Forest Service to begin with-- to scientifically
>>>>    manage the forests so that they're both preserved for people's use and to
>>>>  keep
>>>>    them healthy and reduce fires to a minimum. And we had healthy forests for
>>>>    decades. But then the enviro-kooks came along and said "You're interfering
>>>>    with nature! Stop it!" and got all sorts of laws passed requiring a
>>>>  hands-off
>>>>    approach to forestry and now here we are, with the entire West Coast
>>>>    frequently ablaze.
>>>>    
>>>>    The Native American tribes understood this and would routinely both clear
>>>>  away
>>>>    dead trees and brush from around their settlements and villages and
>>>> conduct
>>>>    controlled burns to reduce the possibility of large out-of-control fires.
>>>>  Then
>>>>    came the white environmentalists, who dismissed the practices of those
>>>> they
>>>>    considered ignorant savages, and decided they knew better how to do
>>>> things.
>>>>    Well, we're seeing how well that worked out, huh?
>>>>    
>>>>    But no, we're still having to deal with idiots like Pelosi, Newsom,
>>>>    Occasional-Cortex, and Karen Bass who insist that this problem can be
>>>> solved
>>>>    with carbon caps and solar panels and windmills, when the truth is that if
>>>>  the
>>>>    U.S. literally shut down all emissions COMPLETELY-- cars, gone; industry,
>>>>    gone; cattle farming, gone; airplanes, gone; all of it, gone-- and we
>>>> lived
>>>>    that way for the next 80 years, it would only reduce the global mean
>>>>    temperature by 0.3 degrees. That's from the U.N. IPCC model itself. You
>>>> can
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========