Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<Hkk1Se5bNU9p7__xNLSQZT3JNgE@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <Hkk1Se5bNU9p7__xNLSQZT3JNgE@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <17e7331a73814274$123023$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <v8cgia$1e4s9$1@dont-email.me> <O-L1WgU1eCsz14Wrc6D7tpNPV7s@jntp> <v8fkn6$23nee$1@dont-email.me> <FS7BRIsxO-_X20VxXPebSsjPIt4@jntp> <v8fudi$256gf$2@dont-email.me> <17e79c94a974a9c6$32993$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <O-3Hf7V3D_mOistYNLB1D2yUOYI@jntp> <v8g2rd$256gf$7@dont-email.me> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: IrZnPd2x7b2u7Q3LSmsBTCXl6yo JNTP-ThreadID: XgGFOrcTXd5ZDEX07aa-LTy0U04 JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=Hkk1Se5bNU9p7__xNLSQZT3JNgE@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Thu, 01 Aug 24 16:34:58 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-01T16:34:58Z/8971975"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> Bytes: 2310 Lines: 14 Le 01/08/2024 à 15:33, Python a écrit : > So yes, your "theory" is "void", completely absurd stupid "void". My "theory" is no more stupid than the theory of universal gravitation. What does the theory of universal gravitation say? That bodies attract each other according to the equation F = -Gmm'/r2 where F is the gravitational constant. What does the theory of universal anisochrony say? That the notion of absolute simultaneity (of the universal present moment) is an abstract entity, and that the adjustment of watches can only be done each time in relation to a single watch, imaginary or not. I have known much more absurd propositions. R.H.