Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<I_SdneKpc6d07tv6nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 01:20:41 +0000
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_Want_to_prove_E=3dmc=c2=b2=3f_University_labs_should_?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?try_this!?=
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <b00a0cb305a96b0e83d493ad2d2e03e8@www.novabbs.com>
 <9687d391072c6f5d19d3e4cad9e944ba@www.novabbs.com>
 <01685fa9d16c8f15a4b8fd63f5b42ed2@www.novabbs.com>
 <b6c06d66a1d5da3a239a49ba5f903e2e@www.novabbs.com>
 <3cccb55b7c7c451a385b8aad5aac6516@www.novabbs.com>
 <cfcd6e742c4f3c2f8a5f69d4db75206f@www.novabbs.com>
 <d793169808c9c1e887527df5f967c216@www.novabbs.com>
 <98a0a1fbdc93a5fcc108882d99718764@www.novabbs.com>
 <fd4937f7b180bac934eb677cca8f5c55@www.novabbs.com>
 <ebcad35958736e6602cf803fddfdb0fd@www.novabbs.com>
 <141e19a1c6acd54116739058391ca9f8@www.novabbs.com>
 <a4f98fa5d026bfbf5127fcbc6a585772@www.novabbs.com>
 <aGN%O.47052$2d0b.43303@fx09.ams4>
 <45ed9424edce8c13db24c1dbb8752c26@www.novabbs.com>
 <8R50P.41756$1efb.23364@fx08.ams4>
 <f099f254468cabc846092196bc0a5e16@www.novabbs.com>
 <pvecnZ1XoJysrNz6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> <67416A99.564F@ix.netcom.com>
 <d6WdnfDP14xjuN_6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <rw6dnQGXptbett_6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:20:15 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rw6dnQGXptbett_6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <I_SdneKpc6d07tv6nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com>
Lines: 266
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-M7frkWr51cWGMkBC8/jCZl6Y9os6TE6IRLBN29UzJX0NBstrbZaYdHR2rTnyLyXf8iVlhVEiSNOQDLu!64972OYj0ZogcKOFD2sr4LXr24CYKX3HzQ2iXtS6xUDTgle8jqJJelYecBd+tbLxRyxzLLH9yJad
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 11501

On 11/23/2024 11:21 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 11/23/2024 10:58 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 11/22/2024 09:39 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/22/2024 01:03 PM, rhertz wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 20:30:39 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip all the history of your life. You didn't read my disclaimer>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bottom line:
>>>>>> It doesn't matter how you put energy into a closed cavity.
>>>>>> In the cavity there will be a black body radiation with
>>>>>> temperature equal to the temperature of the walls.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The reflectivity, albedo or colour of the inner surface
>>>>>> of the cavity are irrelevant. The radiation in the cavity
>>>>>> will always be black body radiation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Make a hole in your cavity, and you have a perfect
>>>>>> black body radiation source.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Its temperature will not be very high, though-
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now smile, asshole.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :-D
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not a BB radiation source!
>>>>>
>>>>> You ignored the fact that the heat goes away from the cavity. It
>>>>> doesn't
>>>>> remain neither inside nor outside. It's eliminated by cooling
>>>>> mechanisms, as I wrote as an initial condition. Read all the posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no light energy left within the cavity, nor heat energy
>>>>> outside
>>>>> it. You better think again about it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You also ignored my post apologizing to all people that
>>>>> participated in
>>>>> this thread. That makes you a bigger ASSHOLE than what I thought.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, start thinking in my NEXT IDEA:
>>>>>
>>>>> Willing to try to prove/disprove E=mc² at a macroscopic level, I'll
>>>>> think of an experiment that incorporates electromagnetic oscillations
>>>>> passing through the cavity, which will be converted in a CAPACITOR, by
>>>>> cutting it in halves and isolating them with a thin ring.
>>>>>
>>>>> What I propose to MEASURE is the changes in the frequency of the LC
>>>>> oscillator, within a time window of about 3 msec, which repeats
>>>>> permanently.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll use a relationship between mass and capacitance for the cavity,
>>>>> with frequency around 1 Mhz or greater.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It was a failed idea for an experiment, but there are OTHER WAYS to
>>>>> check E=mc² at a macroscopic level, without resorting to nuclear
>>>>> energy
>>>>> crap (Kg evaporated vs. energy provided), or else.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ask ChatGPT:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> any other non-relativistic means to prove E=mc^2?
>>>>> or
>>>>> Is there any way to prove E=mc^2 at higher level than quantum?
>>>>> or
>>>>> can I use electrostatic energy?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The last one gave interesting insights. Ask to it sequentially the
>>>>> above
>>>>> lines.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Keep smiling, asshole.
>>>>
>>>> In more civil times we'd just say, "see you later, alligator",
>>>> then the other fellow would say, "in a while, crocodile".
>>>>
>>>> Swearing was considered something trash did,
>>>> or perhaps someone who just stubbed themselves.
>>>>
>>>> Toss your prayer-booth this "super-imposed neutral linac
>>>> and charged cyclotron, measuring while switching on
>>>> and off, each" and see what results. Here if I posed it
>>>> to the large language model, then I'd also prompt it
>>>> reasons what to provide the configuration and energy
>>>> of experiment, and have here a book detailing the
>>>> principles of construction.
>>>>
>>>> This is where Einstein's second-mass famous mass-energy
>>>> equivalence derivation arrives at this from fundamentally
>>>> different principles for the nominally (at least) non-linear
>>>> and furthermore the formally rotating, setting.
>>>>
>>>> And some people even dare to think that "infinity"
>>>> isn't a natural unit, ....
>>>
>>> ohhh, puleeassee..'infinity might be in a world of 'a natural unit
>>> ...number', but infinity is a not....physical.
>>>
>>>
>>> It doesn't exist in the physical world...only exist in the ...mind.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In an imaginary  mind a 'physical infinity' would be like a...
>>>
>>> puzzel
>>> where
>>> the edge
>>> of the
>>> puzzel
>>> has no edge
>>> so you
>>> are
>>> forever
>>> adding
>>> pieces
>>> of
>>> the
>>> puzzel
>>> forever
>>> to
>>> no
>>> ends.
>>>
>>>
>>> It ain't happening.
>>>
>>>
>>> wake up
>>> you're dreaming.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> That "natural units" bit was about light, because saying that
>> c is used as a "natural unit", a unity, has that it's only
>> ever used as an infinity, about "v < c".
>>
>> The 0 m/s, is, infinity s/m.
>>
>> Then, sometimes that's like "differential geometry", someone
>> says "well we don't have d = infinity, furthermore now we've
>> elimited d = 0, as 1/0+ = infinity, and voila bunch of forms,
>> and it's like, that's great, Roger Coates, your forms discovered
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========