Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<I_SdneKpc6d07tv6nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 01:20:41 +0000 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_Want_to_prove_E=3dmc=c2=b2=3f_University_labs_should_?= =?UTF-8?Q?try_this!?= Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <b00a0cb305a96b0e83d493ad2d2e03e8@www.novabbs.com> <9687d391072c6f5d19d3e4cad9e944ba@www.novabbs.com> <01685fa9d16c8f15a4b8fd63f5b42ed2@www.novabbs.com> <b6c06d66a1d5da3a239a49ba5f903e2e@www.novabbs.com> <3cccb55b7c7c451a385b8aad5aac6516@www.novabbs.com> <cfcd6e742c4f3c2f8a5f69d4db75206f@www.novabbs.com> <d793169808c9c1e887527df5f967c216@www.novabbs.com> <98a0a1fbdc93a5fcc108882d99718764@www.novabbs.com> <fd4937f7b180bac934eb677cca8f5c55@www.novabbs.com> <ebcad35958736e6602cf803fddfdb0fd@www.novabbs.com> <141e19a1c6acd54116739058391ca9f8@www.novabbs.com> <a4f98fa5d026bfbf5127fcbc6a585772@www.novabbs.com> <aGN%O.47052$2d0b.43303@fx09.ams4> <45ed9424edce8c13db24c1dbb8752c26@www.novabbs.com> <8R50P.41756$1efb.23364@fx08.ams4> <f099f254468cabc846092196bc0a5e16@www.novabbs.com> <pvecnZ1XoJysrNz6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> <67416A99.564F@ix.netcom.com> <d6WdnfDP14xjuN_6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <rw6dnQGXptbett_6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:20:15 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <rw6dnQGXptbett_6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <I_SdneKpc6d07tv6nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com> Lines: 266 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-M7frkWr51cWGMkBC8/jCZl6Y9os6TE6IRLBN29UzJX0NBstrbZaYdHR2rTnyLyXf8iVlhVEiSNOQDLu!64972OYj0ZogcKOFD2sr4LXr24CYKX3HzQ2iXtS6xUDTgle8jqJJelYecBd+tbLxRyxzLLH9yJad X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 11501 On 11/23/2024 11:21 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 11/23/2024 10:58 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >> On 11/22/2024 09:39 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Ross Finlayson wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11/22/2024 01:03 PM, rhertz wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 20:30:39 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <snip all the history of your life. You didn't read my disclaimer> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Bottom line: >>>>>> It doesn't matter how you put energy into a closed cavity. >>>>>> In the cavity there will be a black body radiation with >>>>>> temperature equal to the temperature of the walls. >>>>>> >>>>>> The reflectivity, albedo or colour of the inner surface >>>>>> of the cavity are irrelevant. The radiation in the cavity >>>>>> will always be black body radiation. >>>>>> >>>>>> Make a hole in your cavity, and you have a perfect >>>>>> black body radiation source. >>>>>> >>>>>> Its temperature will not be very high, though- >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now smile, asshole. >>>>>> >>>>>> :-D >>>>> >>>>> It is not a BB radiation source! >>>>> >>>>> You ignored the fact that the heat goes away from the cavity. It >>>>> doesn't >>>>> remain neither inside nor outside. It's eliminated by cooling >>>>> mechanisms, as I wrote as an initial condition. Read all the posts. >>>>> >>>>> There is no light energy left within the cavity, nor heat energy >>>>> outside >>>>> it. You better think again about it. >>>>> >>>>> You also ignored my post apologizing to all people that >>>>> participated in >>>>> this thread. That makes you a bigger ASSHOLE than what I thought. >>>>> >>>>> Now, start thinking in my NEXT IDEA: >>>>> >>>>> Willing to try to prove/disprove E=mc² at a macroscopic level, I'll >>>>> think of an experiment that incorporates electromagnetic oscillations >>>>> passing through the cavity, which will be converted in a CAPACITOR, by >>>>> cutting it in halves and isolating them with a thin ring. >>>>> >>>>> What I propose to MEASURE is the changes in the frequency of the LC >>>>> oscillator, within a time window of about 3 msec, which repeats >>>>> permanently. >>>>> >>>>> I'll use a relationship between mass and capacitance for the cavity, >>>>> with frequency around 1 Mhz or greater. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It was a failed idea for an experiment, but there are OTHER WAYS to >>>>> check E=mc² at a macroscopic level, without resorting to nuclear >>>>> energy >>>>> crap (Kg evaporated vs. energy provided), or else. >>>>> >>>>> Ask ChatGPT: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> any other non-relativistic means to prove E=mc^2? >>>>> or >>>>> Is there any way to prove E=mc^2 at higher level than quantum? >>>>> or >>>>> can I use electrostatic energy? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The last one gave interesting insights. Ask to it sequentially the >>>>> above >>>>> lines. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Keep smiling, asshole. >>>> >>>> In more civil times we'd just say, "see you later, alligator", >>>> then the other fellow would say, "in a while, crocodile". >>>> >>>> Swearing was considered something trash did, >>>> or perhaps someone who just stubbed themselves. >>>> >>>> Toss your prayer-booth this "super-imposed neutral linac >>>> and charged cyclotron, measuring while switching on >>>> and off, each" and see what results. Here if I posed it >>>> to the large language model, then I'd also prompt it >>>> reasons what to provide the configuration and energy >>>> of experiment, and have here a book detailing the >>>> principles of construction. >>>> >>>> This is where Einstein's second-mass famous mass-energy >>>> equivalence derivation arrives at this from fundamentally >>>> different principles for the nominally (at least) non-linear >>>> and furthermore the formally rotating, setting. >>>> >>>> And some people even dare to think that "infinity" >>>> isn't a natural unit, .... >>> >>> ohhh, puleeassee..'infinity might be in a world of 'a natural unit >>> ...number', but infinity is a not....physical. >>> >>> >>> It doesn't exist in the physical world...only exist in the ...mind. >>> >>> >>> >>> In an imaginary mind a 'physical infinity' would be like a... >>> >>> puzzel >>> where >>> the edge >>> of the >>> puzzel >>> has no edge >>> so you >>> are >>> forever >>> adding >>> pieces >>> of >>> the >>> puzzel >>> forever >>> to >>> no >>> ends. >>> >>> >>> It ain't happening. >>> >>> >>> wake up >>> you're dreaming. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> That "natural units" bit was about light, because saying that >> c is used as a "natural unit", a unity, has that it's only >> ever used as an infinity, about "v < c". >> >> The 0 m/s, is, infinity s/m. >> >> Then, sometimes that's like "differential geometry", someone >> says "well we don't have d = infinity, furthermore now we've >> elimited d = 0, as 1/0+ = infinity, and voila bunch of forms, >> and it's like, that's great, Roger Coates, your forms discovered ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========