| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<IeOcna0GH_Tz87D6nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 01:50:37 +0000 Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:50:37 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Possible stem cnidarian at ~600 Mya Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology References: <ccb486ce-2657-4c17-8281-004f6c1ac437@gmail.com> <hsScnRK3nOvv2rH6nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <c8662bcb-034f-4a35-adf8-4ae5f01a22f2@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: John Harshman <john.harshman@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <c8662bcb-034f-4a35-adf8-4ae5f01a22f2@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <IeOcna0GH_Tz87D6nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 54 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-I8W/3kud2ObMek+UGgH0F5VVns7dTBrUBllTKsOFhmOxT7vtfUtfH4CywoDDAgotkriv2qQNiuejQmi!DCKfkxPFm/l32GYuOlGpor2yML1usCs8/3wJxSBYhA9WASJaMzfhCgJPOZ92+YkR+Ql9FuPtsvo= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4223 On 11/7/24 8:02 AM, erik simpson wrote: > On 11/6/24 8:52 PM, John Harshman wrote: >> On 11/6/24 3:33 PM, erik simpson wrote: >>> > On 11/5/24 10:06 AM, John Harshman wrote: >>> >> On 11/5/24 8:48 AM, erik simpson wrote: >>> >>> https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pala.12242 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> "Abstract >>> >>> >>> >>> The early Ediacaran Lantian Formation in South China contains >>> some of the oldest known representatives of morphologically complex >>> macroorganisms, including various macroalgae and putative animals. >>> The macroalgal fossils have been described previously in several >>> publications, but no taxonomic treatment has been published for the >>> putative animal fossils. This hampers our ability to fully evaluate >>> and communicate the significance of these potentially important >>> Ediacaran macrofossils. To address this deficiency, here we provide a >>> systematic description of these putative animal fossils from the >>> Lantian Formation, including four new genera and five new species: >>> Lantianella laevis gen. et sp. nov., L. annularis gen. et sp. nov., >>> Piyuania cyathiformis gen. et sp. nov., Qianchuania fusiformis gen. >>> et sp. nov. and Xiuningella rara gen. et sp. nov. Morphological >>> comparisons of these fossils and potential modern analogues are >>> provided and critically assessed." >>> >>> >>> >>> This is an article I missed (2016) that describes very-well >>> preserved fossils in the Lantian formation. Among other >>> hard-to-assign specimens is a conical specimen consisting of a basal >>> holdfast and topped with structures strongly suggesting tentacles. >>> The resemblance to cnidarians is unmistakable. The authorship has >>> strong credentials in Ediacaran research. >>> >> >>> >> If they're metazoans, they might be the oldest metazoan fossils, >>> though apparently they're roughly contemporaneous with the Doushantuo >>> biota. >>> > All true, they're only ~10 My after the Doushantuo. Any further >>> with a particular phylum identification is bound to be uncertain. >>> >>> I belatedly remember that lophophorated also have tencacle-like >>> structures. If the fossils are lophophorates, that would move the >>> origin of cnidarians comfortably forward in the Ediacaran, about the >>> time the probable tunicates appeared. I belatedly remember that >>> lophophorated also have tencacle-like structures. If the fossils are >>> lophophorates, that would move the origin of cnidarians comfortably >>> forward in the Ediacaran, about the time the probable tunicates >>> appeared. >> >> Not familiar with any Ediacaran tunicates. What? > https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12542-021-00596-1 If correct, that pushes the origin of chordates way back, and thus of deuterostomes too. I'd like to see how the people competent to analyze these fossils sort out.