Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<J6KcnTjNXNFCrbj6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 19:49:51 +0000
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions? (infinitary)
Newsgroups: sci.math
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org>
 <88e6a631-417a-4dd0-9443-a57116dcbd28@att.net> <vfg07k$1chpe$1@solani.org>
 <7a1e34df-ffee-4d30-ae8c-2af5bcb1d932@att.net> <vfgil3$38pn6$1@dont-email.me>
 <6a90a2e2-a4fa-4a8d-83e9-2e451fa8dd51@att.net> <vfgqoc$39o4h$2@dont-email.me>
 <acd4aad3-9447-45a9-bafd-f8b93d781827@att.net> <vfj3v0$1e96h$2@solani.org>
 <vfjg9h$3rjvp$2@dont-email.me> <vfkqlr$3fii$1@solani.org>
 <vflgnb$fblp$1@dont-email.me> <vflop8$1fpr2$2@solani.org>
 <e7920520807a00a070c701d5953e4416ce0dfd66@i2pn2.org>
 <vfnpf2$ukv3$1@dont-email.me> <vfns3j$3r5kq$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vfoq1m$14lcd$4@dont-email.me> <vfp9q0$3tqss$3@i2pn2.org>
 <vfq750$1fqil$2@dont-email.me> <vfqfpk$3vms5$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vftjuj$26ql1$2@dont-email.me>
 <30dffbdf129483f7b61e3284d1e7bf2ad2e5ea16@i2pn2.org>
 <vg0f4f$2p50e$2@dont-email.me>
 <9ca97f4a24ae1e3041583265125cf860d2fada11@i2pn2.org>
 <vg2bfl$375p7$1@dont-email.me> <vg2c64$3799e$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg2eju$37aml$1@dont-email.me> <30f7c3c7-606e-4fd6-80d7-a89a41e368e9@att.net>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 12:50:00 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <30f7c3c7-606e-4fd6-80d7-a89a41e368e9@att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <J6KcnTjNXNFCrbj6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 56
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-rsVSHn5L+uj0xizpknBhdTMTA9sZJMiuFRKfWXLaBlHgFP8mUxHmpQ5uJtpU9OOdY0G61fumutBUCBw!aAmFmrWho2xe4Rk8+hQEO0OxkO70WHt81k2YJ/PbP1XRdSKbXpV3F0qmCDDoQir68ECDSHgashZL
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3694

On 11/01/2024 08:04 AM, Jim Burns wrote:
> On 11/1/2024 7:38 AM, WM wrote:
>> On 01.11.2024 11:57, FromTheRafters wrote:
>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Actual means that all are there,
>> including the smallest.
>
> Claims like "The ordinals exists"
> work oppositely from how you think they work.
>
> If I claim "The ordinals exist", then
> I don't expand the universe to the ordinals.
> I contract our discourse to the ordinals.
>
>
> Normally (without magic spells),
> talking about stuff doesn't change stuff.
> However,
> we can change _what we're talking about_
> by saying "We're talking about _this_ stuff".
>
> Here,
> you say: the smallest exists.
> That does not pop the smallest into existence.
>
> It contracts our discourse to
> lines which have a smallest.
> But,
> when we look at what else we know about lines,
> we also know that _there is no smallest_
> You have contracted our discourse to
> lines which _do and don't_ have a smallest.
> You have contracted our discourse until
> nothing exists which we are talking about.
> However math.like it sounds,
> talk with no referents is gibberish.
>
>> Why?
>> It is a point on the real line,
>> well separated from its neighbour.
>
> You can contract our discourse to
> real lines with smallest points,
> but they will also be
> real lines without smallest points,
> which makes our discourse gibberish.
>
>


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fnnGzDlslQ&t=600

"Moment and Motion: ...".