Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<J9Xmtz39AgBqogU-q7YYJhVR48Y@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <J9Xmtz39AgBqogU-q7YYJhVR48Y@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem References: <jU8lD51x3TEU8EM3MBCn_dr5mwo@jntp> <bfbd9c23228a1757c6d6e84778338e8e@www.novabbs.com> <lc13m1F7qgsU1@mid.individual.net> <rsrS0rFmndU99mqNBYCDLe8cFU0@jntp> <216ebf535d0d2a02a652841aa8ddba8e@www.novabbs.com> <uS_y7EWpgPGPmPD64dwz49GUbzs@jntp> <433858411d3c6aa17c39265c8a20a3f5@www.novabbs.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: Joys46YaQz3Wc_zqErjghU_HUCk JNTP-ThreadID: Br6-kugn4e1tRMNvjK9C1usNMoA JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=J9Xmtz39AgBqogU-q7YYJhVR48Y@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Sun, 02 Jun 24 14:48:59 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/125.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-06-02T14:48:59Z/8884746"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <richard.hachel@invalid.fr> Bytes: 2340 Lines: 28 Le 02/06/2024 à 15:43, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit : >> > > When we move to level 3 ly, the local watch marks: 3.8345 years >> > > When we move to level 6 ly, the local watch marks: 6.8852 years >> > > When we move to level 9 ly, the local watch marks: 9.9050 years >> > > When we cross Tau Ceti (12 ly), the local watch says: 12.9156 years Correct. >> > > We will then say: What is the observable time that exists between >> the passage in (3ly) and the passage in (6ly)? >> > >> > Well, 6.8852 - 3.8345 = 3.0507 >> >> No. > > YES! No, it's no correct. There is something here that you don't seem to understand. >> As obvious as it may seem, this result is false. > > Nope. There is something here that you don't seem to understand. R.H.