Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<JQP4zy9jD3AZXRuP-EZSv58-TFw@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <JQP4zy9jD3AZXRuP-EZSv58-TFw@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: "Time" vs "physical time"
References: <17e914f508c7a9cf$96455$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <dwvnP-SoKZPwHpz6HgPhxwtG7e4@jntp>
 <v92ugo$4cam$1@dont-email.me> <XhF-ilyxW2WRkQK5uYxoOVgm1rU@jntp> <66b519fb$1$11685$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <DyJxLJAPFNRbLTelPGyf8gFw4_8@jntp> <66b52c61$0$18416$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: Qk5m3WUAE-fkn3dSn6B5iSxHLOs
JNTP-ThreadID: 17e914f508c7a9cf$96455$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=JQP4zy9jD3AZXRuP-EZSv58-TFw@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 24 20:43:26 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-08T20:43:26Z/8980187"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From:  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr>
Bytes: 2377
Lines: 20

Le 08/08/2024 à 22:36, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) a écrit :
> 
> So say it again. Does Hachelian physics predict an observed speed of c
> for relativistic neutrinos traveling the 732 km from CERN to Gran Sasso?
> (with the clocks at CERN and Gran Sasso synchronised by GPS)
> 
> Yes or no will do, 
> 
> Jan

All good relativistic physics must predict an OBSERVABLE speed of the 
neutrino perfectly equal to c.
If a physics does not do it, it is not good.
On the other hand, all physicists must experimentally note that the 
neutrino has this speed, and that no other particle or law of nature can 
exceed it.
The cause is the universal anisochrony against which we cannot, because we 
are in a concrete physics where we cannot do everything we want, resist or 
contradict.

R.H.